Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SolidSupplySide

Thank you for recognizing that the FairTax is not revenue neutral. It is a tax increase.

It is as written, and revenue neutality will require a reduction in rate during Ways & Means Committee markup. I definitely grant that. The rate to be neutral with the temporary Bush tax reforms should be around 19%.

Interestingly most opponents would disagree with you saying that the FairTax does not collect enough and the rate is too low.

Personally I recognize the rate as too high, and push for the lower rate since the legislation is to be revenue neutral by design and plan of its proponents and authors.

23 posted on 12/16/2005 3:30:12 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Don't reform it, Replace it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: ancient_geezer
Interestingly most opponents would disagree with you saying that the FairTax does not collect enough and the rate is too low.

Well, I am ignoring the massive evasion a sales tax north of 10% would create. The underground economy would flourish under a sales tax that high. No jurisdiction in the world has sustained a sales tax rate more than 14-15% due to evasion. Because of the increase in the underground economy, the tax rate for a national sales tax would have to be greater than the theoretical one.

25 posted on 12/16/2005 3:37:15 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson