Posted on 12/17/2005 12:33:45 PM PST by wagglebee
I was thinking the same exact thing. Although Cornwell has no real proof since old Scotland Yard's records were destroyed during the London Blitz, her analysis of the case's circumstantial evidence that Sickert was the Ripper is most compelling.
This may not be a good way to prove the case after all.
However, if the DNA evidence from the letters can be linked to one of the suspects, it would change a lot of things.
Democrats in Congress ask for investigation into potential Bush administration involvement. Sources say that vice president Cheney will likely be asked to testify.
Great!!! I'm a sucker for Red Fedoras
self ping for later reading
Inflation strikes again.
by Siegfried The Red (Subgeniuses are the last TRUE Americans!)
....
No they're not, they're only boring legends in their own idle vapid minds
The Ripper murders were a Victorian Watergate. Check out "Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution" by Stephen Knight. (Scroll down to the reviews.) . Interesting speculation that the Ripper was actually a team of three (one of which was Sickert) eliminating some prostitutes who were trying to blackmail British royalty over a bastard child (who was also a target) fathered by the Duke of Clarence. Heavy Masonic overtones, with Sir William Gull as the Ripper, a coachman named Netley, and Sickert doing lookouts and other go-fer duties. (Sickert supposedly had Ripperesque overtones in his paintings and their titles.)
As you mentioned, Cornwell did the DNA thing, along with noticing the similarity of writing paper used in some notes.
Knight makes an interesting observation on the spelling of one Ripper note, mentioning that "knif" for knife was a clue that an educated person was trying to impersonate someone unlettered. He said someone ignorant would have spelled it "nife".
Lots of interesting speculation that ties things together and leads me to believe he found out the truth.
It's Bush's fault!
I'd cover my bet by placing some money on "person or presons unkonwn" as well, but yeah Montague John Druitt looks good for it.
Waaaay before his time.
Patricia Cormwell had access to orignal records in London, and wrote an excellent non-fiction book which is as you say "a real page-turner". She builds a plausible case for the identity of Jack-the-Ripper.
Cornwell (like most Ripper enthusiasts) tends to skate inconventient facts. To fit her theosry that the Ripper was impotent, she declares Sickett was too, on the basis he had some kind of operation at the age of 5. Ignoring that the guy was married three times.
No motive
to blackmail British royalty over a bastard child (who was also a target) fathered by the Duke of Clarence.
Exactly 9 months before Elizabeth Crook, the alleged Royal Bastard, was born, Prince albert Edward Victor was in the middle of a two month tour of Geramay. Also there ware indicarions that he was not so much attracted to the ladies, if you know what I mean.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
Gods, Graves, Glyphs PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
Isn't she a great author?
Well, according to Cornwell, Sickert's early operation was to repair a fistula (literally a hole caused by a severe infection) in his privates and that the surgery was botched, rendering him "non-functional" physically even though both his normal biological impulses remained intact. Her argument therefore is Freudian in basis, but again, she has no real proof. However, Sickert apparently lived in White Chapel in 1888 and did have a morbid fascination with the Ripper in later life, even painting a picture entitled 'Jack the Ripper's bedroom.'
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.