Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE

Could be because Scott's attorney's want it?


4 posted on 12/17/2005 9:51:59 PM PST by yeetch! (Enjoy the good times (these are the good old days)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: yeetch!
I think you hit it right on the head. I recall Geragos was the attorney who initiated this action and I would think he is owed a lot (Or thinks he is).
8 posted on 12/17/2005 10:12:17 PM PST by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: yeetch!
"Could be because Scott's attorney's want it?"

Good call.

Peterson was found guilty by a jury of his peers and no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. It's absurd for his lawyers to maintain that some purely hypothetical reversal in the distant future should be the basis for denying Rocha the insurance payment she's legally entitled to now.

10 posted on 12/18/2005 12:21:18 AM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson