To: STARWISE
Could be because Scott's attorney's want it?
4 posted on
12/17/2005 9:51:59 PM PST by
yeetch!
(Enjoy the good times (these are the good old days)!)
To: yeetch!
I think you hit it right on the head. I recall Geragos was the attorney who initiated this action and I would think he is owed a lot (Or thinks he is).
8 posted on
12/17/2005 10:12:17 PM PST by
TCats
To: yeetch!
"Could be because Scott's attorney's want it?"Good call.
Peterson was found guilty by a jury of his peers and no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. It's absurd for his lawyers to maintain that some purely hypothetical reversal in the distant future should be the basis for denying Rocha the insurance payment she's legally entitled to now.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson