Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shalom Israel
In this case I'm supportive: they're begging for the right to do what they should be free to do anyway on their property.

I'm with you on this as well.

It is private property and the owners should be able to exercise this option.

Trouble is, the FCC has outlawed cell phone blocking devices in this country. You can order them from a British company that I'm sorry to say do not have a link for.

I've done some casual 'consulting' with several friends who happen to run restaurants and such and those devices would be a Godsend for the atmosphere that they are trying to create.

My 2 pennies worth.

38 posted on 12/18/2005 7:54:26 AM PST by Looking4Truth (Sick and tired of being sick and tired of being screwed over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Looking4Truth
Trouble is, the FCC has outlawed cell phone blocking devices in this country.

That's true. Passive interference, i.e., shielding, is legal. But it's expensive and tricky to do right.

65 posted on 12/18/2005 8:01:59 AM PST by Shalom Israel (Well, I got better...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson