Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: festus
You said you were leaving the thread, but I would like to say anyway that Communism proposes distributing wealth so that everyone's wealth is equal, in the name of some kind of "equality." I was saying something quite different: that when environmental changes affect the survival of everyone, it makes sense to let abundance-in-my-own-country and abundance-in-my-own-lifetime take second priority to survival.

All of our greatness as a nation has been achieved as a result of standing on the moral high ground, and the sacrifices for the next generations of those who came before us are what have made it possible for us to have the blessings that we have today.

A second point is that there are plenty of ways to accomplish this without sacrificing any conservative principles, and in fact consevative principles, properly applied, are the best way to fight our environmental problems.

104 posted on 12/18/2005 12:18:39 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: firebrand

We haven't even begun to tap the Earth's riches. Humans create their own misery. Lack of planetary resources has nothing to do with it.


153 posted on 12/19/2005 12:59:42 PM PST by frgoff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson