Skip to comments.
Time to Investigate the Times
The American Thinker ^
| 12-18-05
| Richard N. Weltz
Posted on 12/18/2005 2:45:44 PM PST by smoothsailing
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: bray
HA! You could accomplish the same thing by marching a platoon of Marines through the building.
Those commie pansies would faint dead away at the mere sight of real men.
21
posted on
12/18/2005 3:21:44 PM PST
by
smoothsailing
('68'69 Nam vet-NEVER FORGET)
To: ErnBatavia
"My fellow Americans. Tonight, I have ordered the arrest of the following United States Senators and their staff....."
22
posted on
12/18/2005 3:23:47 PM PST
by
digger48
To: smoothsailing
Can I get an AMEN.
The leakers and the Times reporter must be lawyer shopping at this point. They should know Bush was not bluffing when he called the leaks illegal.
23
posted on
12/18/2005 3:24:59 PM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
To: DJ MacWoW
***It's a breach of National Security and the NY Slimes and the leaker should be held accountable.***
Thet are traitors to this country. I want a perp walk, and life in prison at the least.
24
posted on
12/18/2005 3:25:44 PM PST
by
kitkat
(Democrat/Socialist/Communist.= Hillary the RED)
To: kingu
Mysterious how the howls for finding leakers of secret information suddenly silence when a real crime has happened... It would be nice if such investigation took 30-60 days, rather than 2-3 years. I hope this leak is the straw that broke the camels back...
To: MizSterious
I think the reporter should be jailed for exposing the top secret program. This is definitly "loose lips sink ships" scenario.
To: smoothsailing
"Is Time Warner Good For America?"
27
posted on
12/18/2005 3:38:18 PM PST
by
TET1968
To: kjo
Time is "investigating" because they already wrote the story saying that NYT walks on water.
Time is the LAST "news" organization to be trusted.
To: Herford Turley
I want frogmarching....followed by frog gigging and frog boiling.
29
posted on
12/18/2005 3:50:00 PM PST
by
smoothsailing
('68'69 Nam vet-NEVER FORGET)
To: smoothsailing
To: TET1968; ErnBatavia; smoothsailing
31
posted on
12/18/2005 3:55:55 PM PST
by
Zacs Mom
(Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
To: SeaBiscuit
The Slimes and the Leaker(s) ARE a serious threat to National Security, PERIOD.Ride 'em, SeaBiscuit. Ride 'em. Amen!
32
posted on
12/18/2005 3:56:31 PM PST
by
Herford Turley
(Conservatism will save America)
To: smoothsailing
..followed by frog gigging and frog boiling.And done publicly so that America could watch it all on Prime Time television.
33
posted on
12/18/2005 3:57:30 PM PST
by
Herford Turley
(Conservatism will save America)
To: Zacs Mom
So true, and well done! Thanks for posting!
34
posted on
12/18/2005 4:03:52 PM PST
by
smoothsailing
('68'69 Nam vet-NEVER FORGET)
To: smoothsailing
The new york times held the story for over 1 year.
According to my calculations, the leak occured late during the '04 campaign. A conincidence?????
To: smoothsailing
The investigation should have begun and been concluded by now, with charges filed.
36
posted on
12/18/2005 4:17:59 PM PST
by
freema
(Proud Marine Mom-What fools they are who doubt the ability of liberty to triumph over despotism)
To: kitkat; Herford Turley
I want a perp walk, and life in prison at the least. I want frogmarching, a police booking, lots of pictures and time to draw a crowd.
It won't happen unless Americans get angry and loud.
37
posted on
12/18/2005 4:20:28 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
To: freema
The investigation should have begun and been concluded by now, with charges filed.I don't get that either.The NYT says they sat on it for a year at the request of the administration.Just because the NYT says that, it doesn't make it so, obviously.
But still, if true, wouldn't the administration have been tipped off a year ago that there had to be a leaker somewhere?
38
posted on
12/18/2005 4:54:48 PM PST
by
smoothsailing
('68'69 Nam vet-NEVER FORGET)
To: smoothsailing
39
posted on
12/18/2005 4:56:01 PM PST
by
Zacs Mom
(Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
To: Zacs Mom
You've left me speechless. Well done.
40
posted on
12/18/2005 5:05:38 PM PST
by
freema
(Proud Marine Mom-What fools they are who doubt the ability of liberty to triumph over despotism)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson