Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach

The part that explicitly says it doesn't apply to communications involving US citizens and permanent residents.


18 posted on 12/19/2005 12:31:48 PM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul

(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person [e.g. citizen or perm. resident

What makes you think that has been violated? There's no evidence of that.


20 posted on 12/19/2005 12:35:27 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: lugsoul
The part that explicitly says it doesn't apply to communications involving US citizens and permanent residents.

So you would rather it did apply to US citizens and permanent residents?

35 posted on 12/19/2005 2:02:26 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Luke 2 : 8-14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson