Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SueRae

Just because JFK did it, Clinton did and Bush does it (those are three articles I've read), doesn't mean it's Constitutional.


3 posted on 12/20/2005 7:58:17 AM PST by BostonianRightist ("Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue." ~ Senator Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BostonianRightist

Criminals get consistutional rights in criminal proceedings...

This is why you can't fight terrorism in the courts.

These wiretaps could never be used in a criminal court, however they are essential to prosecute a war.


33 posted on 12/20/2005 8:29:10 AM PST by rwilson99 (South Park (R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: BostonianRightist
Just because JFK did it, Clinton did and Bush does it (those are three articles I've read), doesn't mean it's Constitutional.

Oh yes it is, unless and until the US Supreme Court rules otherwise.

The problem, you see, is that neither you nor any member of Congress, nor the MSM get to make that determination.

47 posted on 12/20/2005 9:28:28 AM PST by Publius6961 (The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: BostonianRightist

"Just because JFK did it, Clinton did and Bush does it (those are three articles I've read), doesn't mean it's Constitutional."

Absolutely! Laying it off on the other guy really doesn't look good. Presidents weren't meant to be kings no matter what the Tories in our society want.


75 posted on 12/20/2005 10:31:15 AM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson