Poor plaintiffs will have to evolve.
1 posted on
12/20/2005 8:16:06 AM PST by
GSlob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: GSlob
To: GSlob
It is now illegal to have religious motivations as an educator or politician. At least according to this lame brain.
It does not matter if ID is scientifically sound. It does not matter if there is no mention of deity in the ID proposition. (Even though this would not be unconstitutional because it does not establish any particular religion.)
What matters to this nut is that the people who want ID openly express their faith.
They are guilty of being illegally motivated by religious faith.
BTW, ID does not contradict the evolutionary theory of speciation. It also does not explore theology. It is a postulate about the origins of life.
Most high school level or below discussion of evolution fails to make this clear distinction: evolution does not explain the existence of life.
ID is the best scientific hypothesis for the origin of life.
50 posted on
12/20/2005 9:39:00 AM PST by
unlearner
(You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
To: GSlob
"Intelligent design" cannot be mentioned in biology classes in a Pennsylvania public school district What if one of the pupils innocently asks about it in class? Can the teacher allow the topic in a class project or individual project?
74 posted on
12/20/2005 10:34:36 AM PST by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: GSlob
Judge John Jones III, a Republican, was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2002.
To: GSlob
Judge ruled against a strawman, not ID. It was obvious from his bizarre ruling.
99 posted on
12/20/2005 7:14:19 PM PST by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson