[GSlob]

ID is not scientific, per court decision and per common logic. Where would be the life origins of "intelligent designer"? It is called "reductio ad infinitum" fallacy.

[unlearner]

"ID is not scientific, per court decision and per common logic."

Science is not determined by judges or "common logic". Most people believe in some form of creationism. That is "common".

Science is defined by historical use within the philosophy of science.

"Where would be the life origins of 'intelligent designer'? It is called 'reductio ad infinitum' fallacy."

Irrelevant. That's like saying that evolution is unscientific because it does not explain where life comes from.

ID offers a testable, falsifiable hypothesis that living things can only be arise from nonliving things through intelligent intervention.