Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/20/2005 8:28:58 PM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: hipaatwo

Robertson, who was appointed to the federal bench in Washington by President Bill Clinton in 1994 and was later selected by then-Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist to serve on the FISA court, declined to comment when reached at his office late yesterday.


2 posted on 12/20/2005 8:29:41 PM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

If there was no explanation, how does anyone know it was in protest.


4 posted on 12/20/2005 8:30:29 PM PST by pacpam (action=consequence applies in all cases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

Yo, Judge, don't let the door hit you on the butt on the way out.


5 posted on 12/20/2005 8:30:54 PM PST by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

part of their strategy to keep this story going - they get a clinton appointee to walk - he will probably write a book now or an op-ed in the Times.


9 posted on 12/20/2005 8:31:43 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Grampa Dave; Howlin; AliVeritas

Ping a ling


11 posted on 12/20/2005 8:34:54 PM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

Now we know the leaker!

Will he join the bathhouse boys at the NYT now?


12 posted on 12/20/2005 8:35:05 PM PST by roses of sharon ("I would rather men ask why I have no statue, than why I have one". ) (Cato the Elder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

There's is no statement in this article which says why exactly he resigned.

He was concerned about Bush's acts, but nothing says that's why he resigned.


13 posted on 12/20/2005 8:35:32 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

Good. We don't want a bias liberal judge having a negative effect on the FISA process. Don't let the door bump you in the ass on the way out bozo.


15 posted on 12/20/2005 8:37:38 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

Secret????? Yeah, right...like Washington DC can EVER keep a secret


17 posted on 12/20/2005 8:38:59 PM PST by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

I don't know about you guys, but I already feel safer with this guy off the FISA bench.


22 posted on 12/20/2005 8:46:57 PM PST by McGavin999 (If Intelligence Agencies can't find leakers, how can we expect them to find terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

This is the same biased clintonoid judge who proclaimed that the trials of captured terrorists at Guantanamo were illegal.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A34519-2004Nov8.html

One of these two leftist reporters at the Washington ComPost wrote up that earlier article.


24 posted on 12/20/2005 8:47:57 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

Is Robertson "the judge" referred to in this article just out that has leaking to the NYT?

"The judge who oversees the secret court that authorizes intelligence warrants - and which has been largely bypassed by the program - also raised concerns about aspects of the program.


http://nytimes.com/2005/12/21/politics/21nsa.html?ei=5094&en=c385132b746e1109&hp=&ex=1135141200&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print


25 posted on 12/20/2005 8:49:09 PM PST by blogblogginaway (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

Hmm, if Robertson resigned from the FISA court in a protest against GWB's actions, can we assume he will be true to his higher morals and also resign from the U.S. District court in a protest against Bubba's actions? I didn't think so.


30 posted on 12/20/2005 8:57:50 PM PST by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

Sounds like a good thing, someone that irrational shouldn't be on such an important court.


32 posted on 12/20/2005 9:00:36 PM PST by msnimje (Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

This program has been going on for 4 years, yet he only resigns when it's gotten public attention through leaks?

I wonder if he's one of the sources of the leaks? If so, toss his butt in jail.

This program didn't happen without oversight, and those who had the oversight responsiblility had legal recourse to fight the program.

While I commend the efforts of jurists to make sure the laws are being followed and our rights are being protected, it sounds like this particular jurist is playing political games because he hasn't gotten his way through legal means.


33 posted on 12/20/2005 9:02:58 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

"Robertson is considered a liberal judge who has often ruled against the Bush administration's assertions of broad powers in the terrorism fight, most notably in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld . Robertson held in that case that the Pentagon's military commissions for prosecuting terrorist suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, were illegal and stacked against the detainees."

Good riddance.


37 posted on 12/20/2005 9:05:39 PM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

This is a Clinton appointee that tossed out solid indictments against Web Hubbell. He was overturned on appeal after appeal. Very partisan judge - further evidenced by this behavior. Very unjudicial for someone to throw a temper tantrum like this.


38 posted on 12/20/2005 9:06:06 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

A protest ???

Gee .. I don't remember him protesting when Clinton was President and skipping the FISA Court


42 posted on 12/20/2005 9:10:55 PM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Just a thought ..... could he have been 'asked' to resign? Bush did say the other day the Justice Dept. had 'prodecures' to look into how these highly classified leaks came about.


44 posted on 12/20/2005 9:11:38 PM PST by blogblogginaway (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

"Robertson is considered a liberal judge who has often ruled against the Bush administration's assertions of broad powers in the terrorism fight, most notably in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld . Robertson held in that case that the Pentagon's military commissions for prosecuting terrorist suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, were illegal and stacked against the detainees."

Good riddance.


46 posted on 12/20/2005 9:13:05 PM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson