Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
If that is the case, then we would expect to see indictments. If we don't, then there probably wasn't lying.

So you think Clinton (who wasn't indicted) was probably teling the truth?

12 posted on 12/21/2005 6:02:15 AM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b

I think that Clinton's case did go before a Grand Jury, didn't it? There was cause to consider it.

He also lost his ability to practice before the Supreme Court. I think it was over the perjury.


15 posted on 12/21/2005 6:04:18 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson