Are you high?
Everyone has known for years that Humans aren't DESCENDED from Neanderthals, but we're clearly RELATED - two different evolutionary branches, with a common ancestor at some point, of course. Genetic studies have confirmed this.
Do you have any time left in your day after you finish constructing gigantic strawmen?
Many scientists don't agree on whether Neanderthals were human or not. Glad you have all the answers.
Try reading it again. Studies show they aren't related, which is what the post said. What are you reading?
You need to re-read the statement. It claims we are not related to Neanderthals and does not address us DESCENDING from them.
You don't agree. Fine. There's no conclusive evidence one way or the other anyway. No since getting your panties in a wad over it.
I agree that humans aren't descended from any of the Neandertals on which DNA testing has been conducted, but the variation between the Neandertal DNA is so great that I think it's premature to say that we aren't descended from any Neandertal populations. (Moreover, just look at the creationists on this thread!)
Evolutionary 'cousins' as opposed to 'ancestor/offspring'...
I'd like to know how something can be "related" to another biologically without in some way "descending" from it. Also, I thought "common descent" was an evolutionary principle, with all life eventually traceable to the lower, smaller, or simpler life forms. Not that there is a single evolution story. Which one do you believe?
That is a statement of faith, not science.
lol.
[Everyone has known for years that Humans aren't DESCENDED from Neanderthals, but we're clearly RELATED - two different evolutionary branches, with a common ancestor at some point, of course. Genetic studies have confirmed this.]
Absolutely. The reason for this is that God created all life as it now exists.(Some might say, same designer, but they are as wrong as the Darwin Fundamentalists). "Disregard the opposition of science, falsely so called."