Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredFlash

The established church in Massachusetts was based on" Independent" principles, which was not the same as the "separatist" principles(of the Pilgrims) or of those of the Church of England. The colony was until the 169o's ruled by a religious oligarchy who, however, unlike the bishops of the Church, did not constitute a sacerdotal order, but were essentially laymen. After the royal charter was imposed on them, they lost their political function. As far as the "definition" of Protestant, that was well understood: it meant non-papist.


309 posted on 01/16/2006 8:47:59 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
Ahoy my friend:

What were the independent principles the established church in Massachusetts was based on; how did those principles differ from those of the establishment of the Church of England; would it be accurate to say that the Massachusetts establishment was a small step toward the separation of civil authority over religion; are as well informed regarding the other states; and why have you educated yourself so well on this matter?
312 posted on 01/17/2006 6:18:08 AM PST by FredFlash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson