Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New York Times Co. Provides Fourth-Quarter Earnings Guidance (EARLY CHRISTMAS PRESENT!!)
Yahoo Finance ^ | Dec 21, 2005 | Business Wire

Posted on 12/21/2005 2:10:52 PM PST by abb

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 21, 2005--The New York Times Company announced today that fourth-quarter diluted earnings per share are expected to be in the range of 45 to 47 cents, compared with 75 cents in the same quarter last year.

The range includes estimated expenses for the Company's staff reduction program announced in September of $34 to $37 million or 14 to 15 cents per share. The Company also plans to take a charge associated with this program in the first quarter of 2006, at which time the program is expected to be substantially complete.

In addition, in the fourth quarter the Company plans to record approximately $16 to $17 million, or 7 cents per share, of stock-based compensation expense. For the year, stock-based compensation expense is expected to be $31 to $33 million. Previously, the Company had estimated expense of $28 to $32 million.

In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a $5.8 million (2 cents per share) charge for the restructuring of its NYT-TV production facility.

The Company only presents EPS guidance on a GAAP basis. This differs from the pro forma EPS provided by databases such as First Call and Reuters.

The Company has updated its effective tax rate for 2005 from 41 percent to 40.4 percent because of the elimination of a state tax contingency. With the exceptions of stock-based compensation expense and the tax rate, there are no other changes to the Company's full-year guidance for 2005 or its outlook for 2006, which were announced on December 6, 2005.

Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this press release are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include national and local conditions, as well as competition, that could influence the levels (rate and volume) of retail, national and classified advertising and circulation generated by our various markets, material increases in newsprint prices and the timing and amount of savings realized as a result of our cost-control initiatives. They also include other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's publicly filed documents, including the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 26, 2004. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

The New York Times Company (NYSE: NYT - News), a leading media company with 2004 revenues of $3.3 billion, includes The New York Times, the International Herald Tribune, The Boston Globe, 15 other daily newspapers, nine network-affiliated television stations, two New York City radio stations and 35 Web sites, including NYTimes.com, Boston.com and About.com. For the fifth consecutive year, the Company was ranked No. 1 in the publishing industry in Fortune's 2005 list of America's Most Admired Companies. The Company's core purpose is to enhance society by creating, collecting and distributing high-quality news, information and entertainment.

This press release can be downloaded from www.nytco.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: liberalmedia; msm; newspapers; newyorktimes; nyt; oldmedia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: abb; Grampa Dave
abb, I like the wording "profit plunge" in the article you posted.

Gee, why do I feel like having another glass of merlot? HA!

41 posted on 12/21/2005 4:54:53 PM PST by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: abb

HA HA HA HA!!! They will NEVER figure it out! They'll go down rather than be a balanced news source!


42 posted on 12/21/2005 4:58:20 PM PST by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Here's Rooter's story

http://yahoo.reuters.com/financeQuoteCompanyNewsArticle.jhtml?duid=mtfh25074_2005-12-21_22-47-38_n21250279_newsml

UPDATE 1-New York Times forecasts lower quarterly profit
Wed Dec 21, 2005 05:47 PM ET
(Recasts first paragraph, adds details)

LOS ANGELES, Dec 21 (Reuters) - The New York Times Co (NYT.N: Quote, Profile, Research) on Wednesday said fourth-quarter net earnings per share are expected to drop 40 percent from the year-earlier period, due to costs for staff reductions and stock compensation.

The company said fourth-quarter net earnings are expected to be in the range of 45 cents to 47 cents, including estimated expenses for previously announced staff cuts, compared with 75 cents in the same quarter last year.

Analysts expected net earnings of 58 cents per share for the fourth quarter, according to Reuters Estimates.

The costs for the staff reductions announced in September are expected to be $34 million to $37 million, or 14 cents to 15 cents per share. The company also plans to take a charge in the fourth quarter of $16 million to $17 million, or 7 cents per share, for stock-based compensation expenses.

Stock-compensation expense for the year came in higher than expected, at $31 million to $33 million. Previously, the Times Co had said it would be $28 million to $32 million.

In last year's fourth quarter, the company recorded a charge of $5.8 million, or 2 cents per share, for restructuring its NYT-TV production facility.

Aside from a slightly lower tax rate of 40.4 percent for 2005, compared with 41 percent for 2005, the company had no other change to its fiscal-year forecast for 2005 or its outlook for advertising rates for 2006.

The forecast of lower earnings comes amid a tough environment for the U.S. newspaper industry, which has lost market share, subscribers and advertising revenue to online news services. Newspaper publishers also have had to contend with rising costs and falling circulation.

Earlier this month, the New York Times Co., which also publishes the Boston Globe and International Herald Tribune, said it would not issue 2006 forecasts for earnings, revenue growth, or expense growth due to a tough advertising environment.

Shares of the New York Times Co. slid 3.4 percent or 91 cents, to $26.07 in light after-hours trade on Inet, after closing at $26.98 a share on the New York Stock Exchange.


43 posted on 12/21/2005 4:59:26 PM PST by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Note where the NYT says it won't issue forcasts for '06 earnings (or lack thereof).

I guess they still think that they get to decide what is and isn't news...


44 posted on 12/21/2005 5:02:39 PM PST by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: abb

I noticed that. I guess they are following the "no news is good news" theory.


45 posted on 12/21/2005 5:41:14 PM PST by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Lie for food?

I wonder what the journos'll do for actual cash......heheh.


46 posted on 12/21/2005 5:48:36 PM PST by Liz (You may not be interested in politics; doesn't mean politics isn't interested in you. Pericles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Beautiful..........Slimes et al have no place to go but down.


47 posted on 12/21/2005 5:49:58 PM PST by Liz (You may not be interested in politics; doesn't mean politics isn't interested in you. Pericles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

I guess Dads is really upset that Pinch lacks the punch to get the job done.


48 posted on 12/21/2005 5:51:38 PM PST by Liz (You may not be interested in politics; doesn't mean politics isn't interested in you. Pericles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: abb

I expect this time next year for it to drop to $.17 per share. I think the public is going to end up looking at the NYT as the people who weakened our security and they'll take it out on anyone who advertises in the NYT.


49 posted on 12/21/2005 6:01:42 PM PST by McGavin999 (If Intelligence Agencies can't find leakers, how can we expect them to find terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

bttt


50 posted on 12/21/2005 6:03:16 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: abb
The NY Slimes is demonstrating, like GM, that the 800 pound gorillas of the basic sectors are no longer invulnerable to ordinary market forces. Slimes readers and shareholders can thank the new media for exposing the "man behind the curtain," in whom they had childishly and churlishly placed their trust.
51 posted on 12/21/2005 6:12:47 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
at which time the [staff reduction] program is expected to be substantially complete.

Wanna bet?

52 posted on 12/21/2005 6:12:57 PM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Heh heh. Christmas comes a few days early with the NYT's 4th quarter earnings "guidance". Their attempt to get out front with the bad news is, uh, interesting. From the goebbelist's handbook no doubt. If I were a major, or even minor stockholder in the NYT I would be chewing nails and $hitting razor blades right about now. As the stockholders go wobbly on the NYT's earnings "guidance", the stock will make the Titanic look like a lifeboat.

There is something I don't know, but should find out. That is, how are the very few "straight" news operations doing these days. Know of any???

FGS

53 posted on 12/21/2005 8:34:47 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: abb

Now we know. The NYT does actually believe all that garbage written by Krugman, their so-called economic columnist, and their business reporters. And, of course, this proves they were right all along - the economy is terrible and it's all President Bush's fault!


54 posted on 12/21/2005 8:51:22 PM PST by n-tres-ted (Remember November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson