Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New bid to find truth about old race riot
Christian Science Monitor ^ | December 22, 2005 edition | Patrik Jonsson

Posted on 12/21/2005 7:20:09 PM PST by Graybeard58

White supremacists plotted an insurrection in one North Carolina city in 1898, historians now say.

RALEIGH, N.C. - As a horse-drawn machine-gun regiment fired into crowds and frightened blacks fled into the cold swamps, the dream of a Reconstructed South died on the streets of Wilmington, N.C., on Nov. 10, 1898 - more than 30 years after Gen. Robert E. Lee's surrender at Appomattox ended the Civil War.

The uprising began a day after the election in Wilmington, then North Carolina's largest city. The city's Democrats, who regained power from the Republicans, proceeded to wrest control of the government immediately. Supported by para-military networks, historians now say, white Democratic leaders staged a planned insurrection resisted by bands of black men. The party mob, which grew to as many as 2,000, smashed the press and toppled kerosene lamps in a black newspaper office, setting the press ablaze. As many as 100 people were killed in the race riot.

For more than a century, the only violent overthrow of a local government in US history has been hidden in mystique.

Now, a new report challenges the view that held sway for many years - that a provocative statement about white women and black men by a mixed race (then known as mulatto) newspaper editor caused the 1898 riot in a South gripped by fears of miscegenation.

Instead, LeRea Umfleet, a state government historian, writes that a group named the Secret Nine, made up of white businessmen and politicians, played a Wizard of Oz-like role, pulling strings on trained paramilitaries to take control of the city - and the state. It set the stage for Jim Crow laws of the early 20th century.

"Conspiracy is the proper word to be used for the things that happened, which makes it so difficult to write what happened," says Ms. Umfleet. "There are so many layers of conspiracy going on within the Democratic Party, within the leadership in Wilmington, within the white business community, so many layers of people planning for the same end result."

The report is seen as another milestone for a country still trying to come to terms with its violent racial history. It follows similar race riot commissions in Florida and Oklahoma, the US Senate's apology earlier this year for blocking anti-lynching legislation, and renewed investigations into civil rights-era crimes.

"Wilmington was center stage for the country and it said: If you cross this line, violence will be the answer ... and it shattered the American dream," says former Wilmington Mayor Harper Peterson. "We're still trying to recover what we lost."

To some, the report is a way of getting to the truth of an event wrapped in family memories and rumors. Critics say it attempts to judge a former era by modern standards. Wilmington race riot commissioners, however, hope that the report will provide a fuller understanding into how a seemingly spontaneous riot can have conspiratorial roots, and how a long-ago event can affect African-Americans today.

"We do have a national amnesia about these incidents and about the degree to which force and terrorism were part of American politics, especially in the Southeast," says Brooks Simpson, a Civil War historian at Arizona State University and the author of "Let Us Have Peace," about the Reconstruction era.

Umfleet says that the coup d'etat ended the social progress blacks had made in Wilmington after the Civil War.

"North Carolina can point to 1898 and say, 'This is when Jim Crow started,'" says Umfleet. "Wilmington happened, and it was that catalyst that proved that the Democrats could do whatever they wanted and get away with it."

But with her report, Umfleet is also wading into a riptide of emotions. The fact that a government-paid historian is doing the research is bound to upset a lot of people, says Mr. Simpson.

"She's going to be worried about a perception that, here's another person who spun a story in order to advocate a policy, which is exactly what the white supremacists did," says Simpson.

Indeed, many Southerners take umbrage to her findings. They say the commission is a project to color the past with modern-day political correctness.

"If the state of North Carolina is revisiting the 1898 riots, they're doing it for one reason: to make sure that nobody thinks that the riots were in any way the fault of the Negroid race or anybody that might want to support the negroid race for political gain," says Randy Jamison, Virginia state chairman of the League of the South, which is part of the Southern independence movement.

By April, the commission will file a final report and recommendations that may include calls for apology and, possibly, reparations.

"This is an opportunity to realize what took place, what the ramifications were, and how we address the last 107 years, not just in the black community, but in terms of relationships between blacks and whites across the board," says Mr. Peterson.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: jimcrow

1 posted on 12/21/2005 7:20:10 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
...historians now say, white Democratic leaders staged a planned insurrection resisted by bands of black men.

Wait, no that's not right, the democrats love all races.

...it was that catalyst that proved that the Democrats could do whatever they wanted and get away with it.

The more things change the more they stay the same.

2 posted on 12/21/2005 7:26:28 PM PST by infidel29 ("We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid." --Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infidel29
""There are so many layers of conspiracy going on within the Democratic Party, within the leadership in Wilmington, within the white business community, so many layers of people planning for the same end result."

The more things change the more they stay the same.

Ain't it the truth.

3 posted on 12/21/2005 7:29:30 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Graybeard58
Supported by para-military networks, historians now say, white Democratic leaders staged a planned insurrection resisted by bands of black men.

When they say para-military networks, I would assume they mean the Klan. Maybe we could call Senator Byrd to confirm tha.

5 posted on 12/21/2005 7:30:12 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevinjdeanna

Reparations (n): Punitive payments made for past wrongs, to people not the subject of those wrongs, made by people who did not commit those wrongs.


6 posted on 12/21/2005 7:32:24 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Once again, repeat after me, "The real racists were all Democrats."

Bull Connor was a Democrat. All those guys in white sheets were Democrats.

The Democrats were the original guys who bought and sold blacks. Whatever they may pretend, with the help of the corrupt and revisionist media, they are still doing it. Only now it's called the welfare plantation.


7 posted on 12/21/2005 7:32:39 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Graybeard58

When will they change the Democrat to Republican?


9 posted on 12/21/2005 7:34:50 PM PST by SouthTexas (A Merry and Blessed Christmas to all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevinjdeanna

Why do you think "reparations scam?" I didn't see anything about that in the article.


10 posted on 12/21/2005 7:38:25 PM PST by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GAB-1955
Why do you think "reparations scam?" I didn't see anything about that in the article.

Must be those "progressive" blinders you're wearing. Here ya go...

By April, the commission will file a final report and recommendations that may include calls for apology and, possibly, reparations

11 posted on 12/21/2005 7:54:04 PM PST by Publius6961 (The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Graybeard58
The point of this story is??? Democrats are consistent. Intimidation, criminality has always been the norm for them.
13 posted on 12/21/2005 8:54:42 PM PST by isrul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Watch the "progressive" crack. I missed that paragraph. Just because I don't agree with a poster 100% doesn't make me a DUmmy.

Thinking about it, there is a very, very, very weak case for reparations, unlike the slavery scammers. If a riot took place because of government inaction or by action, there definitely could be a tort in civil law. But--and this is a big 'but'-- it does not extend to anyone who wasn't harmed directly by the riots, and they were over 100 years ago. Sorry, Grandson, but you don't get a check over this. An "I'm sorry," maybe, but not a check.
14 posted on 12/21/2005 9:08:34 PM PST by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson