Gee, really? I've been studying this subject for thirty years, and haven't seen anything like that yet. Perhaps you could list it for us?
(Miller Urey, the Finches).
How in the hell do those cases allegedly "show the pillars of Darwinism to be dead wrong?" And yes, I've heard the creationist blathering about it, but even if the creationist nonsense on those two cases was correct (and it's not), even *that* wouldn't "show the pillars of Darwinism to be dead wrong", because those cases aren't even "pillars of Darwinism" -- the mountain of 150 years of accumulated evidence, across multiple cross-confirming lines, is the actual "pillar of Darwinism", and you can't make that go away by trying to kick the legs out from any minor side issue.
Are you sure you know what in the heck you're talking about?
Oh, and probably the total lack of any evidence of one species turning into another.
This is, quite simply, complete horse crap. I myself have seen and verified a vast amount of evidence of one species turning into another.
Are you just parroting creationist pamphlets? Because no one who has followed any science journal for the past thirty years could possibly have missed the massive evidence for evolution, which continues to accumulate daily, and then say something as vastly ignorant as you have here.
Look, if you aren't qualified to discuss a topic, do us all a favor and keep your misinformation to yourself.
Sunlight hit some amino acids and created life,
Wow, you've learned your "science" by listening to the creationists' cartoon-version misrepresentation of it. That's like "learning" about geopolitics by raptly listening to Cindy Sheehan.
and humans and maple trees have a common ancestor.
Yes they do, because there's massively overwhelming evidence for that conclusion.
It's rock solid science and questioning it is like questioning heliocentrism.
Indeed, although many people are ignorant enough to try, because they've read a few creationist pamphlets and think, "now I are an expurt".
Just science that shows the pillars of Darwinism to be dead wrong
Gee, really? I've been studying this subject for thirty years, and haven't seen anything like that yet. Perhaps you could list it for us?
1. Miller Urey
2. Hybridizing Finches
3. Peppered Moths
4. Haeckel's Embryos
5. Archeoptryx
6. The missing link (Piltdown's Fraud)
How 'bout those?
Why can we find pre-Cambrian stromatolite fosil remains, but we can't find the intermediary between man and ape?
I myself have seen and verified a vast amount of evidence of one species turning into another.
Example? And don't use one that's an example of polyploidism because you should know that isn't the kind of gradual change that Darwinists site.
Sunlight hit some amino acids and created life
Wow, you've learned your "science" by listening to the creationists' cartoon-version misrepresentation of it.
No, actually six years of University biology, but why don't you explain how life came into being for us?
and humans and maple trees have a common ancestor.
Yes they do, because there's massively overwhelming evidence for that conclusion.
Again, example? And please something better than "Hippos and Rhinos look kinda the same so they're related."
I've never seen so many people talk so much about something they understand so little.
Owl_Eagle
"You know, I'm going to start thanking
the woman who cleans the restroom in
the building I work in. I'm going to start
thinking of her as a human being"