HOW did this bloke get the job?
I would have thought San Francisco would be the last place someone with his views should be put.
Has anyone mentioned this to Benedict?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: Aussie Dasher
What I don't want is some kind of link between being homosexual and being a molester of minors. Well then close your eyes and stick your head in the sand. Enjoy your blind ignorance, at least until Judgement Day.
2 posted on
12/22/2005 2:59:48 PM PST by
ElkGroveDan
(California bashers will be called out)
To: little jeremiah
3 posted on
12/22/2005 3:00:25 PM PST by
indcons
(FReepmail indcons to join the MilHist ping list)
To: Aussie Dasher
Great moral leaders those catholics.
4 posted on
12/22/2005 3:01:58 PM PST by
Joe Boucher
(an enemy of islam)
To: NYer
6 posted on
12/22/2005 3:04:17 PM PST by
netmilsmom
(God blessed me with a wonderful husband.)
To: Aussie Dasher
Ugh. I hope the Catholics have learned by watching the fiasco in ECUSA, lest they go down the same road.
7 posted on
12/22/2005 3:04:51 PM PST by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || To Libs: Celebrate MY diversity, eh! || Iran Azadi 2006)
To: Aussie Dasher
Matthew 7
7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
To: Aussie Dasher; Coleus
What we have here is.. a failure... to excommunicate.
11 posted on
12/22/2005 3:07:34 PM PST by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: Aussie Dasher
Go forth and sin some more!
12 posted on
12/22/2005 3:08:50 PM PST by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: Aussie Dasher
The LA Times wrote that the trail of abuse in the Los Angeles Archdiocese and its surrounding area dioceses leads inevitably to St. Johns. According to the Times, 10% of St. John's ordinands for Los Angeles from 1950 to 65 have been accused of molesting minors. In two classes, 1966 and 1972, a third of the graduates were later accused of molestation. And Need-a-shower was ordained in 1962. I wonder if they'll have to enforce the age limit to keep the local adults from trying to be choirboys with this assclown in charge.
To: Aussie Dasher
OK, Catholics, explain this to me in terms an Army Sgt. Maj. and and Anglican would understand: isn't this a promotion? And aren't all promotions in the RC church at this level signed off on in Rome? The upper echelon of the Episcopal Church in the US was allowed to fill up with fruits and nuts because, essentially, they promoted each other; ECUSA is not heiratical. But I thought that the Pope was at the top of everybody's chain of command, and therefore vested with a veto, which he could certainly use to squelch a "wet" like this guy.
18 posted on
12/22/2005 3:16:31 PM PST by
Snickersnee
(Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
To: american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...
Catholic Ping Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
19 posted on
12/22/2005 3:16:46 PM PST by
NYer
("Socialism is the religion people get when they lose their religion")
To: Aussie Dasher
Can anyone take the Catholic Church seriously anymore? This is just the same message the public hears ad infinitum.
21 posted on
12/22/2005 3:18:52 PM PST by
billhilly
(Demo camo is yellow and white)
To: Aussie Dasher
Niederauer was a graduate and former English professor, spiritual director and rector of St. Johns from 1972 to 1992."DANGER.......DANGER.....LAVENDER MAFIA IN VICINITY......DANGER!!!!!!!"
To: Aussie Dasher
When news of this gets to Rome, this clown is going to find out that the Church vote goes on a majority of 1, and that "1" isn't going to be too amused with this guy. Benny didn'trun the Inquisition of nothing. Buh bye!
24 posted on
12/22/2005 3:22:26 PM PST by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
To: Aussie Dasher
When news of this gets to Rome, this clown is going to find out that the Church vote goes on a majority of 1, and that "1" isn't going to be too amused with this guy. Benny didn't run the Inquisition for nothing. Buh bye!
25 posted on
12/22/2005 3:22:57 PM PST by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
To: Aussie Dasher
Niederauer said he was troubled that the amendment banned any union beside marriage, a position in direct opposition to Catholic teaching. Maybe I'm reading Leviticus wrong?
5.56mm
26 posted on
12/22/2005 3:23:40 PM PST by
M Kehoe
To: Aussie Dasher
Benedict hired this clown. Sounds to me like Benedict either (i) doesn't have a clue about the seriousness of the homosexuality problem in the Roman clergy, or (ii) isn't the conservative everyone thinks him to be.
30 posted on
12/22/2005 3:30:04 PM PST by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
To: Aussie Dasher
So how long till an American schism? Isn't this a big "up yours" to BXVI?
31 posted on
12/22/2005 3:30:55 PM PST by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: Aussie Dasher
would have thought San Francisco would be the last place someone with his views should be put. Has anyone mentioned this to Benedict?
Actually given the seniority and the "team" the state of California has produced, this isn't a surprise, since California has become a moral hellhole.
The only conclusion I can say is that the Vatican is working at the "grass roots" level of the California moral problem, while hoping the weeds die off naturally, rather than immediately pulling them from the garden.
37 posted on
12/22/2005 3:41:04 PM PST by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: Aussie Dasher
Some who are seriously mistaken have named sexual orientation as the cause of the recent scandal regarding the sexual abuse of minors by priests..."
So then we can assume the good bishop believes those priests to have been your ordinary child abusers/child molesters?
Can't imagine why so many of the victims are boys. (sarc)
Beware the wolf in sheep's clothing.
40 posted on
12/22/2005 3:56:22 PM PST by
Ghost of Philip Marlowe
(Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson