Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Omedalus

Actually, not vestiges of the Civil War

Also, today's Republican Party is not the "party of Lincoln", because Lincoln was for big government, abuse of governmental power, and hypocrisy.

But, no, in Alabama in the 1920s, the Ku Klux Klan served as a perfect fit for the liberal coalition, because well, prohibition, which was the main moral cause of the time, was a cause that was embraced by those who also sought economic reforms to dislodge the old Bourbon alliances from power. In a strange irony of history, one study in the 1920s found that the majority of labor union members in Birmingham also belonged to the Robert E. Lee Klan

Also, many of the "moral perversions" that the Klan of the 20s railed against were primarily practiced (outside of Mobile) by those who were of a higher social class, in other words, the "moral revolt" of the 1920s was also a class revolt, and in this state, the Klan would actually attack it's opponents with all the usual Klan charges, but also with charges that they would take away textbooks from children, and all the other liberal tripe about making it hard on the poor.

It's no coincidence that the big government liberal of the time, Bibb Graves, had served as the Grand Dragon for the state, it was for this same reason that Hugo Black joined. What would become this state's New Deal coalition in this state had it's roots in the politics of the 1920s, and that included the Klan.


288 posted on 12/27/2005 11:46:37 AM PST by AzaleaCity5691 (The enemy lies in the heart of Gadsden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]


To: AzaleaCity5691
Also, today's Republican Party is not the "party of Lincoln", because Lincoln was for big government, abuse of governmental power, and hypocrisy.

Actually, that sounds exactly like todays republican party.

293 posted on 12/27/2005 11:48:17 AM PST by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]

To: AzaleaCity5691
But, no, in Alabama in the 1920s, the Ku Klux Klan served as a perfect fit for the liberal coalition, because well, prohibition, which was the main moral cause of the time [...] Also, many of the "moral perversions" that the Klan of the 20s railed against were primarily practiced (outside of Mobile) by those who were of a higher social class, in other words, the "moral revolt" of the 1920s was also a class revolt

Heh, neat. Thanks for the history lesson.

320 posted on 12/27/2005 11:57:58 AM PST by Omedalus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson