To: peyton randolph
I understand they are kids books, so is Harry Potter. If the movie was really wanted to target the small kids they should have omitted much of the battle scenes...far to violent for the little ones. They didn't so I assumed they wanted to target an older audience.
26 posted on
12/27/2005 11:37:39 AM PST by
Bob J
(RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
To: Bob J
They didn't so I assumed they wanted to target an older audience. CS Lewis books, like the movie, target the 8-12 demographic (the movie is true to the book). Tolkien, like Rowling, targeted age 8 to adult.
42 posted on
12/27/2005 11:40:30 AM PST by
peyton randolph
(<a href="http://clinton.senate.gov/">shrew</a>)
To: Bob J
>>>I understand they are kids books, so is Harry Potter. If the movie was really wanted to target the small kids they should have omitted much of the battle scenes...far to violent for the little ones. They didn't so I assumed they wanted to target an older audience.>>>
Yes, it was a kid's version of Braveheart.
My four year old daughter didn't mind so much though. She was caught up in the fighting.
77 posted on
12/27/2005 11:47:11 AM PST by
sandbar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson