Skip to comments.
Chinese troops in Bhutan raising concern (Alarm over Chinese incursion)
World Peace Herald ^
| December 28, 2005
Posted on 12/28/2005 10:42:39 AM PST by Gengis Khan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: pbrown
"....we're just one big global family, aren't we?"
That's the stated goal of our current administration and the one before and the one before that.
To: Gengis Khan
They are extremely bias and hate the black people.
______________
Remember Kanye West after Katrina?
22
posted on
12/28/2005 11:27:17 AM PST
by
rightinthemiddle
(I might be wrong, but I'm always right.)
To: Gengis Khan
Interesting that all this occurs just on the heals of the Kings announcment that he intends to turn over Buhtan to democratic governance
23
posted on
12/28/2005 11:38:32 AM PST
by
mylife
(The roar of the masses could be farts)
To: pbrown
Consider that the PRC has just trotted out 'their' Panchen Lama. This is done more for the Nepal and Bhutan situations than the Tibetans. They seek to get control of the mountains first.
Then they will seek to overload the Indian Government. They back the pakis who are constantly pressuring the LOC area in Kashmir-Jammu. Think about how the Islamabad did not want US aid personnel to go directly to K/J to help. They did not want international eyes to see the Jihadi bases that they had set up. Do not forget the 'terrorist' attack on the Parliment some years ago.
This must be done slowly in stages. India was born in peace, but they will fight. They have a huge army, and they have nukes. Both the Indians and the PRC remember the 1972 and 1999 wars. The Chinese would love to control the high ground in a future conflict. This is one of the reasons for the sudden appearance of their Panchen Lama imposter. His lies will be used to justify further Chinese encroachment into the Kingdoms of Bhutan and Nepal.
Incidentally, how does a government that officially promotes atheism as it's 'state religion' gain the capability to do something as theologically complex as identifying a reincarnate high Lama? Sounds like another Chinese lie to me . . .
The PRC is backing the Maoists who seek to destabilize Nepal. They are now pushing into Bhutan. The PRC would like very much to control the Indian subcontinent.
Then, once they get their sea-lift capabilities up, they will go after Nationalist China.
They say they want peace and security. What they want is empire. I do not see them as communists. They are just a new generation of Manchus. They do not espouse anything other than their own desire for conquest.
24
posted on
12/28/2005 11:41:22 AM PST
by
Sangey
(Buddha bless the USA)
To: mylife
I was just about to say that.
To: Sangey
The world should act. It won't, but it should. They're taking baby steps now, much the way Hitler started out. To see how the world will react. They didn't, and that was all he needed.
China I believe, is playing the same game of chicken.
26
posted on
12/28/2005 11:50:54 AM PST
by
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
To: panaxanax
Sad and terrifying times we live in.
27
posted on
12/28/2005 11:53:35 AM PST
by
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
To: Sangey
Good analysis. Well said.
To: Gengis Khan
All you folks in Asia better beware and be aware of the interests of the Chi-coms. They feel they should be ruler of all Asia for now and the world later.
You boys in JAPAN hear me? How about Taiwan? Hey Viet Nam, remember how the chineese regularly kick your butts? hold on a minute I think I hear the Chi-coms at your door.
29
posted on
12/28/2005 1:38:46 PM PST
by
Joe Boucher
(an enemy of islam)
To: Honestly; WestCoastGal; all4one; bored at work; Domestic Church; Calpernia; Velveeta; ...
30
posted on
12/28/2005 6:01:29 PM PST
by
nw_arizona_granny
(Happy New Year!!! 2006 a year of Peace, good health, and great joy, as God directs)
To: Candor7
You must be new since everyoe should know china is a permanent member of the security council with the power to veto any resolutions. Even their own.
31
posted on
01/01/2006 7:54:03 AM PST
by
Petey139
To: Candor7
Candor, Either I've missed something or your the dumbest person on this earth. Move this to the Security Council. Oh you mean the one where China has a Veto Power Seat maybe? Serious even if it did make it, China would veto it's ass out.
32
posted on
06/23/2006 9:18:22 AM PDT
by
Petey139
To: Petey139
Yes you have missed something. The Chinese incursion into Buthan is NOT widely known. It needs to be publicized so that the whole world will not go along without a whimper with increasing Chinese "hegemony" which is systematically waged as war in slow motion, incrementally. Thats what the 2008 Olympics are about.
Publicity is needed and the UN Security Council referal would do it. Trouble is, India is chicken, and it handles all of Buthans external relations.
So Petey, thank you for informing me of the details of the capacity of the NSC of the UN. I have a law degree with a concentration in International Law. Is there anything elese you wish to know?
33
posted on
06/23/2006 11:07:49 AM PDT
by
Candor7
(Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson