To: Strategerist
Agreed, applying thermodynamics to agrue the case for or against evolution is the biggest straw man a person can make. Mr. Sewell needs to take a break from the algebra and visit a book on logic.
26 posted on
12/28/2005 3:40:09 PM PST by
stacytec
(Nihilism, its whats for dinner)
To: stacytec
Agreed, applying thermodynamics to agrue the case for or against evolution is the biggest straw man a person can make. Mr. Sewell needs to take a break from the algebra and visit a book on logic.So are there LAWs of Thermodynamics, or not? If there are such LAWs (and all of science recognizes there are), shouldn't we be able to harmonize them with evolution, expecially since we know evolution is as much a fact as gravity, eh?
239 posted on
12/28/2005 7:16:34 PM PST by
Timmy
To: stacytec; Strategerist
Has anyone mentioned "The Universal Will to Exist"? Or is that from back in the time of the big brains?
459 posted on
12/29/2005 5:44:04 AM PST by
Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
("A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both." - Dwight D. Eisenhower)
To: stacytec
The second law of thermo is science not math. It is one of the most important laws in physics. Evolution on the other hand is forging science with a bunch of assumptions. The second law of thermo debunks the assumptions.
To: stacytec
Agreed, applying thermodynamics to argue the case for or against evolution is the biggest straw man a person can make. Mr. Sewell needs to take a break from the algebra and visit a book on logic. Never let thermodynamics get in the way of spontaneous generation.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson