[keithtoo]

That would mean that there was information locally to direct the order. Where did that information come from? How was it stored? How was it replicated?

This issue is not going away.

What you will see over time is that more Religious scientists, agnostic scientists, and even athiest scientists will throw up their hands and admit, either enthusiastically or grudgingly that the theory is broken.

[Baraonda]

The cult will soon be dead.

[Stultis]

That would mean that there was information locally to direct the order. Where did that information come from? How was it stored? How was it replicated? This issue is not going away.

No, it doesn't go away EVEN IF YOU TAKE EVOLUTION OFF THE TABLE. As I quoted him previously, even the author of this article tacitly admits that the storing and transmition of this information, leaving aside it's origin, doesn't make sense per the crevo (mis)understanding of thermodynamics:

Finally, that natural selection seems even remotely plausible depends on the fact that while species are awaiting further improvements, their current complex structure is "locked in," and passed on perfectly through many generations. This phenomenon is observed, but inexplicable -- I don't see any reason why all living organisms do not constantly decay into simpler components -- as, in fact, they do as soon as they die.

Can you be the first to explain how the Second Law can contradict evolution without also -- and more drastically -- contradicting life as such?