Strawman. Dispense with the probability-from-the-assumption-of-an-unbiased-distribution argument already. It is not applicable. Furthermore, you clearly do not have much of an idea of how just how severely strong biases in the phase space cut into the "improbability" that you are asserting for some arbitrary molecular construct. All of which is trivially verifiable with elementary analytical chemistry.
Strawman. Dispense with the probability-from-the-assumption-of-an-unbiased-distribution argument already. It is not applicable. Furthermore, you clearly do not have much of an idea of how just how severely strong biases in the phase space cut into the "improbability" that you are asserting for some arbitrary molecular construct. All of which is trivially verifiable with elementary analytical chemistry.
Are you trying to say that evolution is not abiogenesis?
In other words, the creationist would likely reply with the punchline to that old joke, "No. Get your OWN dirt."
BTW, what on earth are you referring to (specifically) by "strong biases in the phase space" ?? Steric hindrance? "Handedness?" You're not being quite specific enough, increasing the odds that you and the other poster will be talking past one another.
Cheers!
...not too much longer on this thread, I've gotta go see "CATS" down at ASU...