Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jbloedow
Ah, one of my favourite evo red herrings, but in the name of changing the topic, let's go at this one.

First, Sewell's critique does not deal only with the origin of life. That said...

Of course in the narrowest sense ToE, by virtue of the mechanism of natural selection, presupposes life, and only operates on life, but evolution in the more generally accepted, though arguably more slack, understanding of the term, certainly assumes a gradualist and Naturalist theory of abiogenesis.

Abiogenesis is origin of life. Just because some asshole says a slack understanding of the term evolution assumes naturalistic abiogenesis does not mean that thermodynamics is troublesome for evolution once life exists.

No one claims to know how life started. There is speculation and there is research, but no detailed hypothesis.

889 posted on 12/30/2005 12:39:18 PM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 885 | View Replies ]


To: js1138

At this point it appears you're not even trying to understand what I'm saying. Thanks for the memories.


890 posted on 12/30/2005 12:53:25 PM PST by jbloedow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 889 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson