Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: smoothsailing

He's right about Lieberman; I wouldn't vote for him, but he's an honest, well-meaning opponent, instead of the harridans, kooks and Clintons that have overrun the Left like a malignant tumor.


7 posted on 12/28/2005 9:38:35 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Warning: Adult language, but great Christmas message: http://foamy.libertech.net/noxmas.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Darkwolf377
I couldn't support Lieberman in a general election but if he was running for President in the Democrat Presidential primary, I'd support him in the hope that he'd win the nomination.

That way at least,assuming that the Republican nominee was also strong on national defense,regardless of who won, America's security would be safe.

11 posted on 12/28/2005 9:58:14 PM PST by smoothsailing (HAPPY NEW YEAR FREEPERS !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf377
He's right about Lieberman; I wouldn't vote for him, but he's an honest, well-meaning opponent,

I disagree. Lieberman is an opportunist. The so called "conscience of the Senate" doesn't take a firm stand on anything. He was against Hollywood, until he was Gore's running mate, he turned on a dime. He is for the Iraq war but the abuse he took made him vote against the Patriot Act and appear on tv in full Democrat mode. I wouldn't trust him at all.

20 posted on 12/29/2005 2:46:20 AM PST by patj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson