Either there is no "gay gene" or evolution as a theory is wrong. Pick one, libs, and wake me up when you decide what you believe.
"Either there is no "gay gene" or evolution as a theory is wrong. Pick one, libs, and wake me up when you decide what you believe."
Or the 'gay gene' is a genetic mutation and thus, a disease.
How can you conclude that? Evolution allows for mutation. It even requires it. It's entirely possible that a mutation is responsible for homosexuality.
Of course, such a mutation might not get very far, but even homosexuals sometimes have children, so such mutations might be passed on.