Skip to comments.
Nevada power plant to close after dispute
AP ^
| 12/30/5
Posted on 12/30/2005 8:01:33 AM PST by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
To: Iris7
A 1600 MW coal plant burning low sulfur Western coal will consume about 54 tons of coal a minute (not hour). Think 80,000 tons of coal a day. Where do these figures come from? I calculate 23 to 25 thousand ton/day.
41
posted on
12/30/2005 11:16:18 AM PST
by
BipolarBob
(Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I looked in my rearview mirror.)
To: antiRepublicrat
The plant's already been running for 34 years, so can't have too much of a life left in it. What is your estimate of lifespan of a 1500 mw powerplant? Bear in mind boilers can be re-tubed, turbines rebuilt and auxillary equipment replaced. Longevity estimates are sometimes made for bond issues, regulators or other single issue bodies. These estimates may have no real basis.
42
posted on
12/30/2005 11:31:00 AM PST
by
BipolarBob
(Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I looked in my rearview mirror.)
To: BipolarBob
It uses 13-14 thousand tons/day.
To: SmithL
Environmentalists said they sympathized with the tribes, but argued Edison had plenty of time to fix the plant's pollution problems. Edison should invest in renewable energy sources on tribal land, which would benefit the people "who have been exploited all of these years by the greater metropolitan centers of the West," said Roger Clark, director of the Grand Canyon Trust's air and energy program. Oh please, shut the hell up.
Renewable energy my arse. There's companies in my neck of the woods that are approaching landowners about installing wind turbines. You should hear the "outrage". "We support renewable energy, but...", "wind power is good, but...".
There's claims by groups that oppose wind power that the light flickers from the turbines can cause seizure in some people, that birds get killed in large numbers, etc. I asked by brother's girlfriend whose parents live ~2000' feet from a farm of nine wind turbines and she indicated that the noise is very low, they have very few (< 30 dead birds) in the ~5 years the turbines have been running, etc. Another person who lives down the road from this wind farm says they have experienced none of the problems that opponents of wind farms are claiming.
Sorry, but if people believe that most eco nuts support renewable energy, think again, at least based on the recent experience around these parts...
44
posted on
12/30/2005 11:41:48 AM PST
by
Fury
To: MARTIAL MONK
It uses 13-14 thousand tons/day. That is possible but it may not be running full load. Also I would need to know the btu value of the coal and the efficiency of the unit to make a realistic estimate of fuel usage.
45
posted on
12/30/2005 11:46:57 AM PST
by
BipolarBob
(Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I looked in my rearview mirror.)
To: Iris7
For decades, investor-owned utilities in the US were the envy of the world. Power companies could reliably project their future needs and build generation to meet this need when it arrived. Stockholders (for widows and orphans was how the stock was characterized) could expect steady but unflashy dividends and knowledgeable state utility commissions exercised oversight so things rarely got out of hand.
Then, in the early 1980s, utilities began to see other utility companies as the source of new growth. Utility executives voted themselves large quantities of stock, then sold out and cashed in when the company changed hands. Other utilities reinvented themselves as non-regulated holding companies with their utility interests relegated to almost sideline status. Minnesota Power sells used cars. The former Iowa Power and Light Company of Des Moines and Iowa Public Service of Sioux City are part of Warren Buffet's conglomerate. Four or five other Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa utilities are now headquartered in Madison, WI.
This is not a healthy trend.
To: BipolarBob
There have been a LOT of meetings on this. I attended some. It is snagged in between Navajos vs Hopis, traditionalists vs progressives, state vs federal, etc. The only constant has been the eco-freaks.
Stakes in the operation have been sold recently so someone sees a future in the plant. It will shut down and that should have a focusing effect on a bunch of people. This baby is too big to let go. Las Vegas will lose 6% of their power but new gas plants are coming online. The big loser will be SoCal.
To: BipolarBob
Hi, Bob,
You are correct and I was in error.
1600 MW = 1,600,000 KW
1,600,000 Kw * 24 hrs./day = 38,000,000 Kw/hr/day)
38,000,000 Kw/hr/day * 3412 Btu/(Kw/hr) = 130,000,000,000 Btu/day
Western low sulfur coal about 11,000 Btu/lb at 33% efficiency is 3,600 output/11,000 input.
(130,000,000,000 Btu/day)/(3600 Btu/lb) = 36,000,000 lb./day
36,000,000 lb/day * ton/2000lb = 18,000 tons per day. 12.5 tons per minute.
Dang. Was working from memory using info I remember from a different plant. I must have confused pulverizer capacity with full load coal usage. I had better use a pencil, paper and calculator instead of just a calculator these days!
An excuse! An excuse! Quick, blame someone else! At least blame it on coefficient confusion!
Your 25% efficiency is likely more accurate than 33% since you seem to be working from coal to MW/hrs metered into the grid and I was using only coal to generator output.
48
posted on
12/30/2005 12:18:47 PM PST
by
Iris7
(Dare to be pigheaded! Stubborn! "Tolerance" is not a virtue!)
To: Iris7
PRB coal is 8500 BTUs. Illinois Basin would be in the 11,000 range.
To: SmithL
"Environmentalists said they sympathized with the tribes, but argued Edison had plenty of time to fix the plant's pollution problems. Edison should invest in renewable energy sources on tribal land, which would benefit the people "who have been exploited all of these years by the greater metropolitan centers of the West," said Roger Clark, director of the Grand Canyon Trust's air and energy program."Typical 'environmental' solution to their perceived problem. Demolish all conventional infrastructure and build unsightly windmills and solar photovoltaic farms to occupy the entire landscape so no natural vistas remain in the desert. Won't the Grand Canyon look grand thouroughly dotted with supersized windmills, initial construction financed by government subsidies, without sufficient maintenance funds to demolish after they run for about 10 years and then are abandoned in place.
Look what they've done to Palm Springs.
50
posted on
12/30/2005 12:31:28 PM PST
by
Cvengr
(<;^))
To: BipolarBob
What is your estimate of lifespan of a 1500 mw powerplant? Don't know. But the famous coal-fired Battersea Power Station's boiler 1 lasted 36 years, boiler 2 less than 30. In the end, it'll all boil down to the numbers, but with compliance costing more than the today's-value cost of the original plant with no increase in output, efficiency, or longevity of the actual power systems it doesn't look good to me.
To: SmithL; Carry_Okie; calcowgirl; SierraWasp
52
posted on
12/30/2005 12:34:59 PM PST
by
FOG724
(A vote for McCain is a vote for Hillary)
To: SmithL
I'm happy...I see this monstrosity through my panoramic windows all the time. It's the biggest eyesore you've ever seen.
53
posted on
12/30/2005 12:35:41 PM PST
by
Hildy
To: MARTIAL MONK; BipolarBob
Your first hand information of 13,000 - 14,000 tons/day makes sense. Mohave must have been base loaded since forever.
"Stakes in the operation have been sold recently so someone sees a future in the plant." Paragraph is interesting, and for sure southern California will get the short end.
That will get some political noise going! Excuses! Finger pointing! Politicians in high dudgeon! Evil Capitalists! Greed! Oppression of the weak! Self righteous "environmentalists"!
54
posted on
12/30/2005 12:42:12 PM PST
by
Iris7
(Dare to be pigheaded! Stubborn! "Tolerance" is not a virtue!)
To: Cvengr
Where are these windmills ?
To: Eric in the Ozarks; Dog Gone
Thanks, Eric. Should have been more careful.
My coal consumption estimate was wrong for more reason than overestimating HHV and so water consumption was also. Say 30,000,000 gallons per day, not 169,000,000, and 55,000 households not 375,000. A 10" pipe not a 24".
56
posted on
12/30/2005 12:56:17 PM PST
by
Iris7
(Dare to be pigheaded! Stubborn! "Tolerance" is not a virtue!)
To: Iris7
I worked in the coal business before moving over into petroleum in 87. My family had a small coal mine, wash plant and marketing company. We bought coal from other small mines and washed and sold the coal. A Great Lakes coal sales company bought us out and I was introduced to all kinds of coal blending, burning equipment, specs, etc. Our specialty was 12,800-13,500 East KY/West VA coal off the Big Sandy. We railed this to ports in Ohio then put it on steamships for our dock network.
In 86, our company was bought by a major oil company and I got the job of selling all the resids a year later.
To: SmithL
A large coal-fired power plant will close at the end of the year rather than violate a court-ordered deadline to install an estimated $1.1 billion in pollution-control measures. geez, $1.1 billion could build a brand new plant... but the enviro-psychos would object to that to.
To: Hildy
That monstrosity was built in 1970. You moved there when?
This is the panoramic view that you bought.
To: Iris7
Regardless, if costs more to bring into compliance than it's worth, it gets sold for scrap. The enviros win another one.
60
posted on
12/30/2005 1:22:18 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson