Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC's Bogus "Pope Joan" Story Also Hocked Debunked "Rule of Thumb" Myth
Newsbusters.org ^ | 30 December 2005 | Dave Pierre

Posted on 12/30/2005 3:14:10 PM PST by infoguy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: MeanWestTexan; jo kus; bornacatholic

Papal infailbility ping.


21 posted on 12/30/2005 4:14:42 PM PST by x5452
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

bump for publicity


22 posted on 12/30/2005 4:15:57 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

What a crock. Where is the "news analysis" of muslim customs? Oh, that's right, the leftist media has declared war on the (mostly) white, middle-class male.

Same old lies and disinformation. Men beat their wives using the "rule of thumb" measure.

Calls to the domestic abuse shelters increases during the Super Bowl.

Do you see a pattern here?


23 posted on 12/30/2005 4:21:16 PM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan; Bear_in_RoseBear
The effect of the Cadever Synod backfired on Stephen. Formosus' supporters, appalled by Stephen's macabre trial, rebelled. He was deposed, imprisoned and strangled to death."

If the Cadever Synod failed at the box office, why did Sergius III do a remake nine years later? (This time Formosus got chucked in the Tiber at the end, and still they recovered the body.)

24 posted on 12/30/2005 4:27:26 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Free Speech is not for everyone, If you don't like it, then don't use it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: infoguy
If you are an adult male, take a ruler and measure across the widest part of your thumb. It should be almost exactly 1 inch.

Just a clue as to where "rule of thumb" came from.

25 posted on 12/30/2005 4:41:21 PM PST by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

I am shocked at the notion of digging up popes for trial, and the notion that anyone who did this was still pope and capable of speaking ex cathedra makes me laugh at the possibility of union between the Orthodox and Rome.

Rome should have distanced itself from this years ago.


26 posted on 12/30/2005 5:44:52 PM PST by x5452
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: x5452

What more are they supposed to do to distance themselves. The pope who led the trial was promptly imprisoned and killed. The next pope annuled the verdict only months later. Then a year later the pope forbade any future trials of dead people.

Also the dead pope accused at trial really had invited the Franks to invade Italy.


27 posted on 12/30/2005 6:03:02 PM PST by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: calex59
So liberals are all upset about people who beat their wives hundreds of years ago but do not care that muslims beat, and kill, their wives regularly in todays world. Shows you the type of mind set they really have.

The answer is simple. Complaining about Moslems beating their wives doesn't hurt the Christian church any so they have no interest in it.
28 posted on 12/30/2005 6:43:46 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

and next week Diane Sawyer has an explosive expose on the secrets of the Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion. She blows the lid off of this previously unheard of secret plan for world domination by the joooos!


29 posted on 12/30/2005 6:54:20 PM PST by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
Then a year later the pope forbade any future trials of dead people.

Which doesn't explain why Sergius III tried dead Formosus again several years later

Also the dead pope accused at trial really had invited the Franks to invade Italy.

Well that was more or less tradition.
Stephen III did it in 753.
Leo III did it
And in the 12th Century, the Normans would be invited in (the Franks having become the effete French in the meantime)

30 posted on 12/30/2005 6:55:32 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Free Speech is not for everyone, If you don't like it, then don't use it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

If thy can still claim ex cathedra after such a perfect realization of the fact popes are human and that primacy is a matter of honor not dogma, they have yet to distance themselves.


31 posted on 12/30/2005 8:28:37 PM PST by x5452
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: x5452
If thy can still claim ex cathedra after such a perfect realization of the fact popes are human and that primacy is a matter of honor not dogma, they have yet to distance themselves.

Ex cathedra doesn't deny that popes are human, it only claims they are infallible when they are specifically invoking ex cathedra -- Which has only happened twice in all of history I believe? It doesn't even deny that popes can make lots of theological errors when they aren't invoking ex cathedra, which they almost never are. Pope Honorius made some whoppers for example (but so did lots of patriarchs).

Ex Cathedra doesn't say that popes are perfect and won't make embarassing mistakes and even do really terrible horrible things. They just can't do it while invoking ex cathedra, which again has only ever happened twice.

I reject the invention of Ex Cathedra by Vatican I, but I wish people wouldn't exaggerate what it is.
32 posted on 12/30/2005 9:31:48 PM PST by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Ex Cathedra is a crutch to allow people to compartmentalize and hide from errors that can't happen if infallibility existed in the first place. It is the curtain behind which the wizard stands. The nutty case for ex cathedra as it exists today is largely a modern retelling of the story to save face. In practical application, history tells a much different story. But, as with liberals, let's not let the facts get in the way of anything.


33 posted on 12/31/2005 7:28:33 AM PST by Havoc (President George and King George.. coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: x5452

Primacy wasn't about honor, it was about political power and using sophistry through a religious forum to achieve it. That really is the bottom line. To protect power, they doctrinalized their political propaganda. No mystery and it isn't terribly original.


34 posted on 12/31/2005 7:52:15 AM PST by Havoc (President George and King George.. coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tet68
So liberals are all upset about people who beat their wives hundreds of years ago but do not care that Muslims beat, and kill, their wives regularly in todays world.

Thank You!!!

35 posted on 12/31/2005 7:55:48 AM PST by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

mine is 13/16ths and I’m 44....go figure it’s an estimate ... a ‘rule of thumb’ ha


36 posted on 11/28/2011 12:15:17 PM PST by reed13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson