Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The full title wouldn't fit in Free Republic's 100 character limit. Below is the full title.

A Timely Stretch

Boeing believes the 747-8 will challenge the A380 for a piece of the ultra-large market.





Happy New Year!

1 posted on 12/31/2005 10:38:20 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; namsman; ...

If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail.

2 posted on 12/31/2005 10:45:07 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
"For it is the engines designed for the 787 with significantly higher bypass ratios, 1:8.75 for the newly designated 747-8, that promise to give the 747 a real kick in performance."

I would be a bit sceptical about the engine being a GE. They have never been as reliable as the P&W.

The original 747 was designed to fly with engines that had a 6:1 bypass ratio and a static thrust of 44,000 lbf. The airplane's gross weight was originally 618,000 lbm if my memory serves.

I certainly wish them luck. The 747 was my baby when I worked at the Lazy-B.

6 posted on 12/31/2005 11:49:51 PM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
>>He claims the 747-8 "will burn 13% less fuel per seat than a 416-seat 747-400 and 12% less than a 542-seat A380."<<

I wonder how many millions of tons of jet fuel this difference would amount to over the life-cycle of the aircraft in service. Where are the enviros on this issue? They should be picketing and boycotting Airbus and all airlines that use more fuel than they have to.

Enviros are all about "conservation" and lecturing us about the need to drive a more efficient car. A single jumbo jet uses a lot of fuel in a month. Yet the enviros are silent on the fuel used by jumbos. Why? Maybe it is because it would mean that a US company (Boeing) would benefit from such agitation. Excuse my cynicism while I watch the enviros agitate instead to block drilling in ANWR.
9 posted on 01/01/2006 5:00:50 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
I think right now these airlines are in line to buy the 747-8: British Airways, Cathay Pacific Airways (unless Airbus can demonstrate 8,000 nautical mile still-air range at standard MTOW for the A380-800), Japan Airlines, and a few others.

The reason why British Airways and Japan Airlines favor the 747-8 over the A380-800 is the fact both airlines control a large fraction of the landing slots at their respective home airports (London Heathrow and Tokyo Narita), so there is no pressure to buy as big a plane as possible.

10 posted on 01/01/2006 5:41:24 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative

If It Ain't Boeing...
I ain't going!


23 posted on 01/01/2006 7:10:14 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
Happy New Year Paleo.
If it ain't Boeing , I ain't going.
27 posted on 01/05/2006 6:18:57 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson