To: Donald Meaker
The South did not appeal to legality because they would have lost. They appealed to the sword, and lost. It is debatable. We could say it about North: "The North did not appeal to legality because they would have lost. They appealed to the sword, and WON."
55 posted on
01/01/2006 11:31:11 AM PST by
A. Pole
(If the lettuce cutters were paid $10 more per hour, the lettuce head would cost FIVE CENTS more!)
To: A. Pole
It is debatable. We could say it about North: "The North did not appeal to legality because they would have lost. They appealed to the sword, and WON." The North didn't attack Fort Sumpter.
83 posted on
01/01/2006 1:10:00 PM PST by
chudogg
(www.chudogg.blogspot.com)
To: A. Pole
It is not debatable. The south fired on Ft. Sumpter. The south took over federal property, by force.
Just Facts.
115 posted on
01/02/2006 6:06:52 PM PST by
Donald Meaker
(You don't drive a car looking through the rear view mirror, but you do practice politics that way.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson