[PatrickHenry]

From the article:

Indeed, if ever there were a view of economics that builds in the blind, purposeless processes of trial-and-error, specialization, and complexity (the hallmarks of the Darwinian algorithm) it is Smith’s invisible-hand economics -- the Austrian variants of which are the most strikingly evolutionary in character.

[snip]

A further, delicious irony in all of these quibbles about the relative merits of Intelligent Design comes in the fact that conservative proponents of ID may have borrowed their tactics directly from the left. According to philosopher Stanley Fish, writing in Harper’s: “[The ‘teach the controversy’ battle cry] is an effective one, for it takes the focus away from the scientific credibility of Intelligent Design -- away from the question, ‘Why should it be taught in a biology class?’ -- and puts it instead on the more abstract issues of freedom and open inquiry. Rather than saying we’re right, the other guys are wrong, and there are the scientific reasons why, Intelligent Design polemicists say that every idea should at least get a hearing; that unpopular or minority views should always be represented; that questions of right and wrong should be left open; that what currently counts as knowledge should always be suspect, because it will typically reflect the interests and preferences of those in power. These ideas have been appropriated wholesale from the rhetoric of multiculturalism -- “

This article is right on target.

[stephenjohnbanker]

Bingo.

[highball]

A further, delicious irony in all of these quibbles about the relative merits of Intelligent Design comes in the fact that conservative proponents of ID may have borrowed their tactics directly from the left.

I've been saying that for months - ID is little more than warmed over PC.

ID attempts to redefine words for political ends. ID requires science to conform to political dogma. ID wants to avoid anyone's delicate sensibilities from being hurt. ID elevates feelings to the level of facts.

This new PC is every bit as dangerous as the old one.

Shame on any "conservative" who eagerly embraces PC just because they think they can get a temporary political advantage out of it.

[Coyoteman]

===> Placemarker <===

[VadeRetro]

Just superb!

[Hacksaw]

This article is right on target.

Nope, but it's a new spin, anyway. We'll just have to completely ignore the blatant fact that the loudest allies of the Darwinists are left wing activists - the ACLU, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Morris Dees, Barney Frank, etc...