Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anger, Sorrow as Relatives are Told Only One US Miner Survived Blast (West Virginia)
NetscapeNews ^ | 1/04/06 | unknown

Posted on 01/04/2006 8:43:05 AM PST by beyond the sea

TALLMANSVILLE, United States (AFP) - Relatives of 13 coal miners trapped for nearly two days underground reacted in anger and sorrow after hearing that only one had survived, and not 12, as had erroneously been announced earlier.

Families keeping vigil at a church had broken into hymns when they heard that the 12 men had survived. Three hours later, their jubilation turned into grief when they were told the miners were dead.

"The initial report from the rescue teams from the command center indicated multiple survivors, but that information proved to be a miscommunication," International Coal Group (ICG) president and chief executive Ben Hatfield told reporters.

Hatfield identified the lone survivor as Randal McCloy, 27, who was taken to West Virginia University Hospital, where a doctor said he was in critical condition and dehydrated, with a collapsed lung.

"The 11 remaining miners in the barricade structure were determined by the medical technicians on the rescue team to have already deceased," Hatfield said.

The community had been waiting anxiously for news on the miners since they were trapped early Monday by an explosion that ripped through the Sago mine as they were resuming work after the Christmas and New Year holidays.

One body was recovered late Tuesday, but shortly before midnight (0500 GMT Wednesday), bells pealed and cheers erupted at the nearby Sago Baptist Church, as West Virginia Governor Joe Manchin announced: "They told us they have 12 alive."

Three hours later, people left the church in a state of shock and in tears after mining officials inside had confirmed the grim news that only one of the miners had survived.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.netscape.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: alive; dead; media; mine; miners; sagomine; westvirginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Armedanddangerous

Could it be the company president was more worried about actually rescuing the miners and not what the media was erroneously reporting?


21 posted on 01/04/2006 9:31:17 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Because the product (coal) was so badly needed that it had to be recovered at any cost?

And meanwhile we can't drill for oil in ANWR. Beam me up!

22 posted on 01/04/2006 9:32:23 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Actually in the FR threads at the time the MSM was being attacked for not being enthusiastic enough about the good news; Geraldo was being praised, however.


23 posted on 01/04/2006 9:33:45 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

I guess everyone is so quick to shoot the messenger that they are missing the obvious miracle - 1 miner survived!

Sure there is a lot of heartache on parade, but I certain that that survivor and his family are glad that he made it. I wonder if the media even cares. I suppose this guy is an inconvenient detail in the rush to exploit a tragedy.

Well I won't play. Personally I'm happy that the heroic rescuers found at least one miner alive. They should be rewarded with praise, not given the cold shoulder just because they couldn't save all of the lost miners. As details come out, it may just be that the others had no chance. Regardless, they did save one life, and we should be joyous for that miracle.


24 posted on 01/04/2006 9:37:48 AM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
Geraldo is merely practicing for his next career in evangelism. I hate him now and always will.
25 posted on 01/04/2006 9:39:47 AM PST by freebird5850 (tell the truth, there's less to remember!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin

Personally, my husband and I thought at the time he sounded drunk or high. We both commented on it while he was talking.


26 posted on 01/04/2006 9:42:10 AM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
I agree and that makes the one family member screaming she is going to sue someone even more disgusting.

Grief manifests in many ways however the thought of suing so fast is appalling.

Same to media for exploiting family members in such a pathetic display to cover their asses.
27 posted on 01/04/2006 9:42:13 AM PST by alisasny (BYE B YE TOOKIE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Armedanddangerous

re: He should have gotten word to the families right away, not waiting for near on three hours

He waited until he had the facts. It is very difficult in the heat of a disaster such as this to get facts. He should have been the first place the media went to seek confirmation of a rescue.

I have no idea what happened to start the rumor in the church that 12 had been rescued. What I DO know is that from the very first mention of a rescue Fox news was reporting it as fact. No mention of the possibility that the report was based not on a statement from officials, state or local, just that 12 of them were alive.

Very poor journalism. Along with the ability, protected by the constitution no less, to report the news comes a responsibility and obligation to get it right.

The anchor at Fox probably just took it for granted that the reporter on the scene had exercised the normally expected care to confirm what was about to be reported. In the news of 30 years ago the story would have been filtered through any number of editors, none of whom would have passed information up the line that he or she had not confirmed for himself or herself. A large part of the problem is that they now have the ability to put on the air almost anyone from almost anywhere. The task of confirmation has fallen to the least experienced member of the team, the person at the scene.

Remember how long it took for the networks to report that JFK was dead? He was DOA, but it was at least two hours before the networks could confirm the facts sufficiently to air them. That level of professionalism is a thing of the past.

The simple fact is that a lot of news people ran with a story that had not been confirmed. The story was that families at the church had been told of a rescue of 12 men. What hit the air was that 12 had been rescued alive.

I know it seems like nit picking, but all of those rules and standards are there for a reason, and this is what happens when they are ignored or skipped.


28 posted on 01/04/2006 9:50:46 AM PST by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

The object is not to get it correctly, but to get it first...ratings...equal revenue...and all newscorporations are whores...


29 posted on 01/04/2006 9:53:25 AM PST by carton253 (Al-Qa'eda are not the Viet Cong. If you exit, they'll follow. And Americans will die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

And a poor PR job by the company. I've been in the Public Affairs/Corporate Communications business for many years and one of the highest priorities is to quash rumors as soon as they start flying. This Hatfield guy let the families celebrate for three hours before breakng the bad news to them. He should have immediately looked into the rumor through his contacts on the scene.


30 posted on 01/04/2006 9:54:42 AM PST by travlnmn41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

"Could it be the company president was more worried about actually rescuing the miners and not what the media was erroneously reporting?"

My thoughts exactly. I can't imagine him sitting back watching Geraldo and letting folks think they were alive. My bet is that he didn't even know people thought they were alive.


31 posted on 01/04/2006 9:55:55 AM PST by HawaiianGecko (Unless I start calling Peshawar using phrases like as "I want my 72 virgins now," I figure I'm safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

he shows the same emotion with each new wife and sleep partner, howls and screams this is the one only to drop her a few years later along with whatever kids are produced from the union


32 posted on 01/04/2006 10:02:34 AM PST by dubyawhoiluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

Certainly this is devastating to all involved. However, one thing I wondered.... they originall said 12 alive and 1 dead. Did not one of those families wonder if the 1 dead was THEIRS??? So when it changed to 12 dead, it now meant all of those not considering this possibility were crushed. I don't get it. I would've been the family thinking my guy was the dead one (just the Irish in me I guess).


33 posted on 01/04/2006 10:03:51 AM PST by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise

Geraldo on Fox now. He was just asked if media should take any responsibility. He responded that you can't blame the messenger. Sounds like he is blaming the Gov's office.


34 posted on 01/04/2006 10:04:49 AM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise

"they originall said 12 alive and 1 dead. Did not one of those families wonder if the 1 dead was THEIRS???"

Impeccable logic! I hadn't thought of that.


35 posted on 01/04/2006 10:05:48 AM PST by HawaiianGecko (Unless I start calling Peshawar using phrases like as "I want my 72 virgins now," I figure I'm safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Well I won't play. Personally I'm happy that the heroic rescuers found at least one miner alive.

They should be rewarded with praise, not given the cold shoulder just because they couldn't save all of the lost miners. As details come out, it may just be that the others had no chance. Regardless, they did save one life, and we should be joyous for that miracle.

I agree. Others would be happy, too, if somewhere, someone hadn't bungled the statement that they had found the other 12. Once it got twisted it must have circulated like wildfire.

I'd be pretty darned miserable if I were the one(s) who brought false hope to a sad situation. God knows that would be punishment enough.

In the future, I have a feeling there may be a little tighter cap on information getting out until the miners do. You aren't out until you feel the sun on your face.

36 posted on 01/04/2006 10:07:45 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

Remember Katrina? The MSM bungled the facts about it right from the gate. Do you ever hear them admit their often incorrect facts? Never. Another reason to shut them off.


37 posted on 01/04/2006 10:10:13 AM PST by attiladhun2 (evolution has both deified and degraded humanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea
I'm guessing that the lone survivor is going to need a long, long time to get over the survivor's guilt. How horrible for those families.

My heart goes out to them.

38 posted on 01/04/2006 10:11:28 AM PST by TChris ("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
"And there is our wonderful media exploiting this poor woman. . . " No kidding, only I have other adjatives than "wonderful".

I was up early this morning (Munich) and caught CNN just as they broke the story of the survivors. The guy and reporter babe on the scene just babbled on and on. It was so obvious that they couldn't understand the religious beliefs and joy of these simple folks and their efforts to "dance" around the faith issue was enough to make one puke.

Later I returned home just in time to catch the breaking news about the one survivor and twelve deaths. You could see the CNN team visibly relax and immediately go into the "blame mode". They beat the drum about the anger, they managed to get in the religious angle that despite their prayers there was no miracle. On and on.

I try to give up on CNN and catch the BBC, but, they are just as bad. Guess I will have to get a dish and find some other intelligent English language channel. Like Nick at Night, yes that's the ticket!
39 posted on 01/04/2006 10:16:28 AM PST by lowbuck (The Blue Card (US Passport). . . Don't leave home without it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Drilling for oil - whether it be in ANWR, the Gulf, or in your own backyard - will not dispense with the need to mine coal, and it is disingenuous to say that it will.

Unless, of course, you are planning on mothballing the coal-fired plants that account for almost 50% of our electricity, and the entire US steel industry, and converting the whole thing to a petro system. I don't think you'll find a single soul who would attempt to justify that on any basis.

40 posted on 01/04/2006 10:17:11 AM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson