Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An investigation into anti-spyware
Ars Technica ^ | 3 January 2006 | Jeremy Reimer

Posted on 01/04/2006 9:56:58 AM PST by ShadowAce

A report by Mark Russinovich has raised serious concerns about the seedier side of anti-spyware. He investigated a number of programs that claimed to be spyware removal tools, and found that some of them not only do a poor job of detecting spyware, but may in fact be hazards themselves.

Spyware has become big business in recent years, bringing in as much as US$1.6 billion in 2004. As spyware proliferates, the market for anti-spyware also grows, and many products such as Ad-Aware and Spybot Search and Destroy have arisen to combat this threat.

However, it appears that some programs are now attempting to straddle both sides of the fence. Many of these are advertised by familiar banner ads that mimic Windows error dialog boxes, and say things like "Your computer may be infected. To scan, click 'Yes' below." The entire banner, however, is hotlinked to a website which instructs the user to download and run an alleged anti-spyware program.

When several of these programs were tested on a clean, freshly-installed Windows XP partition, they erroneously reported several Windows components (such as cookies left by MSN.com and the Windows Remote Desktop Service control) as being spyware. The program offered to clean these "infections" after the user had entered his or her credit card data to unlock the full functionality of the software.

A closer examination showed signs that this so-called anti-spyware package was in fact exhibiting many of the same behaviors as the spyware it claimed to be fighting against. When viewed in Process Explorer, the processes associated with these programs have no company name or description, no digital signature to confirm their authenticity, are compressed to prevent easy tracking, and often mimic internal Windows system process names.

Who are these companies that are producing fake anti-spyware packages? Domain traces on the websites they promote lead to a confusing trail:

Not surprisingly, the SpySheriff website reveals little about the company behind it. A Whois of the domain points to Popandopulos Ltd in Greece as the owner, but the associated email address is crystaljones@list.ru, which is a Russia-based domain. List.ru appears to be an ISP from its Whois information, so it's doubtful that the Spysheriff domain registration is accurate.

So how does one guard against these digital mimics, who pretend to be treasure chests but turn into snapping horrors? A list of the worst offenders has been compiled:

Ultimately, however, the responsibility for identifying the fake software lies with the end user. However, as the spyware companies get more and more tricky and insidious, this becomes an increasingly difficult task. Hopefully, the upgraded and bundled Microsoft Anti-Spyware that will ship with Windows Vista will help mitigate the problem.


TOPICS: Technical
KEYWORDS: fakes; firefox; malware; spyware
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
Hopefully, the upgraded and bundled Microsoft Anti-Spyware that will ship with Windows Vista will help mitigate the problem.

Cute.

21 posted on 01/04/2006 10:51:34 AM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

bump for publicity


22 posted on 01/04/2006 10:54:11 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onehipdad
I found the following walkthrough at Bleepingcomputer.com's forums:

How to remove WinFixer and Virtumonde

I haven't gotten hit with WinFixer, so I haven't tried this walkthrough, but in general HijackThis is a great tool if you know how to use it, so I wouldn't be too hesitant to try this. I hope it helps.
23 posted on 01/04/2006 10:56:15 AM PST by Turbopilot (Nothing in the above post is or should be construed as legal research, analysis, or advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: quefstar

Just replaced my Sygate Firewall/Avast/Ad-Aware & Spybot lashup on a Windows 2000 Pro system with Earthlink Protection Control. (Mainly because Symantec bought Sygate and promptly dropped support for my firewall down the toilet.)

System is so smooth and transparent it's almost eerie, uses maybe twenty minutes per WEEK for detailed scans (instead of the former half hour or so on every startup) and just plain kicks butt. Only problem I've had is that one of my hot links looked suspicious to Earthlink, and it took some time to get the sharp teeth untangled from the remains.

It's doing a SUPERB job for me. (But I check it, just to be sure.)


24 posted on 01/04/2006 11:14:37 AM PST by Unrepentant VN Vet (I can't really accept a welcome home until the last MIA does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rintense
I've never used Microsoft products other than their operating systems and office suites. Their products have so many 'holes' that I've never given their other products any consideration.

I run Windows 2000 and am very happy with it (my PC originally came with Windows ME...was that a piece of junk!). W2000 is the most stable operating system I've used. I've considered at times upgrading to XP but why pay for that when what I have performs so well? I have a Corel version of Linux but have never installed it. Until lately I only had a 20Gb hard drive and didn't want to take up the additional disk space on something I wasn't sure about. Now I have more disk space but am also leery about compatible software. I doubt I'll ever get Linux installed.
25 posted on 01/04/2006 11:25:21 AM PST by bcsco ("The Constitution is not a suicide pact"...A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Bookmarked


26 posted on 01/04/2006 11:28:15 AM PST by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: Turbopilot
Good grief! Why don't we just tell the people who make spyware to stop it and make something that people actually desire. Something that enhances computer use. Seems like they'd make money from that, too. If not even more.
28 posted on 01/04/2006 11:42:53 AM PST by A knight without armor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Spybot installed a process on my PC that appeared to be monitoring all mouse activity. I couldn't disable it without completely uninstalling it. It significantly delayed my response time. Adaware solved my problems.


29 posted on 01/04/2006 11:45:19 AM PST by Real Cynic No More (iLiberals and MSM manipulate the news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense
It keeps telling me Firefox is spyware.

Ummm.. to Microsoft, it is!

30 posted on 01/04/2006 11:46:33 AM PST by NoCmpromiz (Don't take life too seriously... it's not permanent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: quefstar

Earthlink is doing a good job for me after I finally downloaded their latest spyware definitions. I also use Ad-ware. Their virus protection seems top notch also.


31 posted on 01/04/2006 12:00:25 PM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot

Six pieces of software running just to protect you from deficiencies of the OS. It's really sad if you think about it.

There's an ad: "Get Mac or Linux so you don't have to install, learn and run so many programs that you really don't want anyway."


32 posted on 01/04/2006 12:56:34 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot
Having the common sense not to visit websites such as www.pr0n-n-w4r3z.ru

Hey! Are you dissing my home page? ;-)

33 posted on 01/04/2006 1:58:16 PM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pirate21

bookmark


34 posted on 01/04/2006 2:08:10 PM PST by Pirate21 (The liberal media are as sheep clearing the path along which they will be led to the slaughter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Er, "site."

Funny. I thought you were making fun of the fact that so many of those types of posts/email/IM scams are written by folk that don't speak english natively. ;-)

35 posted on 01/04/2006 10:51:23 PM PST by zeugma (Warning: Self-referential object does not reference itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I'm very careful when surfing, and have not had any spyware in awhile. However, my wife downloaded a game last night, and now we have SpyAxe and Spy Sheriff on our computer, as well as 2 viruses (W32.Beovens and W32.Puper). I posted my Hijack This! logfile to spywareinfo.com, but they are inundated with requests, and it will take a few days to get a reply, so I guess I'll be working on the computer all day today on my day off to try to get this crap off my machine.

Has anyone used SpySweeper? Is it worth it? Spywareinfo.com has it for $19.95 (ends today), and I was considering buying it.


36 posted on 01/05/2006 7:43:21 AM PST by Born Conservative (Chronic Positivity: http://www.livejournal.com/users/jsher/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson