Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TXBSAFH

in the lab where I work, over a thrid of our machines are NT. TO upgrade to another operating system would mean having to buy new instruments that the computers run. THat would kost $80-100K per machine - just not feasible.


59 posted on 01/04/2006 10:48:39 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: doc30

For some limited applications you are right. I know of a business the has a custom built aplication that is vital to there work. It dates back to 1985 and has to run on just the favor of unix. The hardware it runs on is 15 years old.


64 posted on 01/04/2006 10:51:44 AM PST by TXBSAFH ("I would rather be a free man in my grave then living as a puppet or a slave." - Jimmy Cliff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: doc30; TXBSAFH; ShadowAce
in the lab where I work, over a thrid of our machines are NT. TO upgrade to another operating system would mean having to buy new instruments that the computers run. THat would kost $80-100K per machine - just not feasible.

On the other hand would it make any sense to upgrade the computers connected to the instruments? If they originally came with Windows NT, they're probably around 200-400 Mhz. You could probably redeploy newer computers that aren't worth upgrading to handle Windows Vista, but would run Windows NT 10 times faster or more. Windows NT 4 is compatible with Windows Server 2003, so it can be integrated with networks.

87 posted on 01/04/2006 11:41:55 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson