Posted on 01/05/2006 3:44:28 AM PST by billorites
WASHINGTON -- House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi had just finished a typically discursive floor speech shortly before the year-end adjournment when a very liberal member approached her second-in-command, Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, and whispered in his ear: "Steny, is it not time for a coup?" It obviously was not time to oust Pelosi and replace her with Hoyer. House Democrats do not get rid of their leaders with coups, as Republicans have during the last half-century. Nevertheless, dissatisfaction with Pelosi's performance is pervasive across the ideological spectrum. Her colleagues grumble that under her leadership, the party lacks focus and a clear agenda necessary to take advantage of Republican disarray.
This deficiency is referred to by some House Democrats as "the Nancy problem," but it really transcends failings of their party leader. They remain tied to obsolete practices that freeze in place aged committee leaders. Their rhetoric betrays inability to free themselves from New Deal tax-and-spend policies. The Republican majority looks divided, out of gas and threatened by serious scandals. But Democrats fear they are ill-equipped to seize their opportunity.
The Democratic Caucus vote that propelled Pelosi to power was cast Oct. 10, 2001, when Pelosi defeated Hoyer for party whip, 118 to 95. But the authenticity of that outcome always has been questioned inside the caucus because of the exaggerated influence by Pelosi's fellow Californians. Thirty of the outsized California delegation's 31 Democrats voted for Pelosi, some reluctantly. Minus them, Hoyer had a clear edge over Pelosi of 95 to 88.
Many Democrats inside and outside of Congress see the wrong person elevated as their House leader by accident of geography. It is hard to deny that Hoyer surpasses Pelosi in backroom strategy sessions, in floor debate or in television interviews. The man from southern Maryland seems a better voice for a party trying to expand its base than the woman from San Francisco.
Today's gap between minority leader and minority whip is wide and visible. Hoyer is no conservative and delivers the partisan stemwinders expected of a party leader. But he also is unapologetically pro-business and pro-national defense, while Pelosi consistently runs in the opposite direction. Hoyer voted to go to war and for bankruptcy reform, while Pelosi was against both.
When Rep. John Murtha in effect called for immediate U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq, Pelosi in the secrecy of the party caucus embraced that dangerous political course. After two weeks of internal debate, Pelosi backed down to Hoyer's position of effectively letting the House members individually pick their own way.
It is not ideology, however, that makes many Democrats yearn for Hoyer. The congressman who whispered about a coup in Hoyer's ear is much closer to Pelosi ideologically. He and other Democrats are simply appalled by Pelosi's image as a party leader. While she got by delivering 60-second speeches as an ordinary congresswoman, she seems distracted and lost in making four-minute Democratic closing arguments on a bill.
Pelosi neither sets an agenda nor offers inspiring messages, but she cannot be held wholly responsible for the superficial quality of Democratic rhetoric from the House floor. Debate on bills ordinarily is led by the senior committee member, who is bound by cliches and stereotypes. One of the best and longest lasting of Newt Gingrich's reforms when he became House speaker in 1995 was to institute term limits for Republican committee heads. The Democrats keep their leaders as long as they live.
The Democratic management of legislation in the House is handled by the likes of John Dingell, 79, Energy and Commerce Committee (25 terms); Tom Lantos, 77, International Relations (13 terms); John Conyers, 76, Judiciary (21 terms); David Obey, 67, Appropriations (18 terms); and John Spratt, 63, Budget (12 terms). These are men who generally talk about moving the previous question more than moving the nation.
The combination of such senior citizens and the 65-year-old Pelosi produce a mind-numbing product that is not calculated to take advantage of an unpopular war and a climate of scandal. Pelosi is reported fearful that if Democrats do not finally regain control of the House this year, she may be replaced by Hoyer. There are House Democrats who feel that change ought to come sooner to prevent another election defeat.
LOL!Oh, really!? So some sanity does exist over in Kooksville?
Pelosi has an empty void between her ears. Every time I see her on TV she looks like a deer caught in headlights. The lights are on but nobody's home. How this fool ever got elected is beyond me. Are her voters really that retarded?
I am hoping that there is no coup and that Nancy Pelosi becomes House Minority leader for a very very long time.
I would even add that I'd like to see Howard Dean as head of the DNC for a very very long time.
I would want the Dems to keep Pelosi and Dean in power. They really rock. I am serious. No matter how badly Republicans are doing, they say these assinine things and our side looks sane and brilliant.
That is so true!
Democrats, please keep her in power!
Just for the entertainment factor.
Novak is no conservative, he just has a conservative suit he wears to work every other week.
This is why the other Dems want them out. They know how NOT to get reelected.
And as a warning to children on the dangers of plastic surgery.
HAAAA! I'm with you SL...let em all stay and self-destruct.
Until the Democratic Party stops listening to the loony left- they are destined to have leadership with no values or substance. These are petty people.
LOL!
NANCY PELOSI---The Gift That Keeps On Giving
The best way to keep them in power is for Republicans to launch an offensive against them. The knee jerk response will have to be to strengthen their hold in the Party.
And Nancy and Howard are not necessarily above manufacturing such a situation to retain control. But why wait? ;-)
Go Nancy, go!
This is great, if true. Those Dems that voted for Pelosi would have to admit that they made a mistake.
LOL! It looked so much better on Phyllis Diller.
What they miss is that with no absolutes in their value systems,a desire for power because they feel entitled to it,and at the core a dislike for our capitalist economic system,it takes a great orator and intellect to fake it.
An air headed ideologue,whose first statements as party leader reflected her feminist victim mentality (something to the effect of it took 200 years for the country to reach the point where she was elected leader),is not going to inspire much outside her own closed little world.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.