My blog has plenty of ammunition that could be used against the MEK. You’re welcome to use it for that if you wish. When it comes to my research on the MEK, I’ve cataloged an old NCRI platform in order to check it against the one they have now. I've also cataloged a few old interviews that I've found. Again, I have not made any opinion about this material and there are plenty of things within them that I disagree with. But that's not the issue. The issue is that the mere existence of this material on my blog makes you assert that it is a pro-MEK blog. It most certainly is not a pro-MEK blog! It is not an anti-Monarchy blog either. It is simply an informal accumulation of documents to facilitate my musings on different topics. Your perception of my bias is yours and yours alone. The fact that others agree with you is no indication of correctness. In fact it only demonstrates the flaw propagates throughout your consensus body.
Erase the flaw by challenging the assertions therein, not me! Calling me names is like shouting at the moon… I enjoy engaging people who disagree. Either they’ll pull their hair out in frustration or we will begin the long march toward a RESOLUTION together. I hope said RESOLUTION comes before war. No one wants an all out war with Iran. I certainly do not.
"Your perception of my bias is yours and yours alone. The fact that others agree with you is no indication of correctness."
Hmmm.... must not be my perception alone then since others agree.
"the mere existence of this material on my blog makes you assert that it is a pro-MEK blog."
No. I never said that. I said I saw "a load of whitewashing of MEK".
How come you catalog pro-MEK stuff only? Have you bothered to catalog statements by the U.S. government and our military and advisers that are anti-MEK? Since you haven't directed me toward a link on your blog to those articles, I'll have to assume you haven't posted any. I'd say that's evidence of a bias on your part.
You may have information on your blog that can be used against MEK, that's pretty meaningless. You have yet to condemn them yourself or use your information to challenge the MEK's actions, beliefs, etc.
Calling you names? What names?
Remember this...?.." no it is not the conspiracies so deep and wide that you imagine are against you, those exist only in your head."
Apparently, things exist only in Your head.
"It’s because of what you can’t see, or rather, are unwilling to see. Your words indicate you're nearly blind."
Maybe that describes you with regard to MEK.