One thing that is being overlooked and under reported is the judges ruling on the worthiness of ID. I do not have the ruling in front of me, so I can not quote him directly, but he made a statement containing the following idea. "ID deserves to be EXAMINED, DISCUSSED, AND DEBATED" If not in the classroom, where? It is legal for the District to have a book in the library, but they can not tell of its' title or contents? How is this possible!
"If not in the classroom, where?" - In a theology classroom, of course. Surely they teach theology at the nearest seminary, or even in a Sunday school. Just not in a science classroom.
Do you really want to expose your, and others', religious beliefs to scientific scrutiny?
Science generally leaves religion pretty much alone, and until the Wedge Strategy, religion pretty much left science alone.
Now, there has been a major Trojan horse attack on science by some creation proponents under the guise of ID.
If you bring religious belief/ID into the science or the philosophy classroom you are not exempt from a critical examination. Do you really want that?
As an example, do you want a scientific analysis of the biblical version of the global flood? The evidence for a global flood is not good.
Is it not better to leave well enough alone?