[Robert A Cook PE]

The question is, in a "new world order" (no cap's deliberately!) DELIBERATELY created by the liberal science and college environment WITHOUT morals or self-control, WHAT will prevent a liberal from (deliberately) politicizing (falsifying!) his or her research and finding?

We see it in the EPA numerous times, particularly in environment "causes" and "impacts, but it is in psychology and family and children's studies and teaching even more.

NO (liberal) now can defend their lifestyle and political choices without lying, and being (deliberately) lied to. so, in that culture of corruption, why should a "scientist" demand the truth when it (seldom) promotes his or her agenda?

[grey_whiskers]

WHAT will prevent a liberal from (deliberately) politicizing (falsifying!) his or her research and finding?

The Pajamadeen! We caught Dan Rather, didn't we?

Actually, a number of the scientists get caught through carelessnes...I remember reading a thread within the past week of one who was supposedly an "up-and-comer" destined for a Nobel prize who had faked numerous work, but who used the same data in a number of different papers, which led to his undoing.

And there was a Harvard cardiologist who got caught when one of his longitudinal studies included one subject who (according to the published birthdays, etc.) would have had to become a father at the tender age of 7.

Cheers!