Posted on 01/07/2006 11:26:27 AM PST by pabianice
The U.S. Naval Academy has ordered a court-martial for a faculty member who made a "crude" remark in the presence of female midshipmen, even though an investigating officer recommended only administrative action.
The three criminal charges against Lt. Bryan D. Black come as the Annapolis school's superintendent, Vice Adm. Rodney P. Rempt, has announced a "zero-tolerance" campaign to rid the campus of sexual harassment. Lt. Black says he is being unfairly prosecuted as a "poster child" for Adm. Rempt's campaign. The academy filed criminal charges days after the school's board of visitors criticized Adm. Rempt after a Defense Department sexual harassment task force scolded the school. Adm. Rempt's anti-sexual-harassment policy includes urging midshipmen and staff to view for the third year straight a play called "Sex Signals." The language is so graphic that Adm. Rempt recommends that children should not attend any performance of the three-day run on campus, starting Monday. "The two-person show explores how mixed messages, gender role stereotypes and unrealistic fantasies contribute to misunderstandings between the sexes," Adm. Rempt said in a message to staff. An academy spokeswoman declined to comment on Adm. Rempt's decision to court-martial the officer. Lt. Black, who has been removed as an oceanography teacher at Annapolis, has filed an appeal of Adm. Rempt's decision with Navy Secretary Donald C. Winter. "I do not believe my case has been handled fairly on its merits or on the facts," Lt. Black said. "Rather, I believe I am the 'poster child' being held out as an example following the critical evaluation of the academy and by direct extension, its leadership and superintendent personally."
(Excerpt) Read more at insider.washingtontimes.com ...
PC is gutting the Country I love.
Sadly true however I purpose to continue "to fight the good fight" until they lay me to rest!
Women who get easily offended shouldn't be in the military. That's obvious, isn't it? I guess only to me.
They made us have a one day stand-down for sexual harassment training....on a ship of 5500 men, no women.
I gotta know what he said. I can't think of anything dirty enough to warrant three criminal charges.
I wonder if the Navy would change its tune if a few thousand members resigned, "because they were afraid they too might offend a member and therefore also face criminal charges."
Yeah, that is more like it.
I must have the wrong year, I wasn't onboard in '91. Must google....
What's she going to do if the enemy captures her and tells her dirty jokes? Is she going to give away all the secrets.
Amarosa????
So, What was the joke ?
Write to Senator McCain.
Remember when women demanded to be allowed to enter these institutions. It was said they wouldn't change a thing.
Hazing had been a tradition for centuries. Some of it was over the top, but much of it actually helped to build a strong toughened graduate.
Then the women entered the scene, and now it's even verboten to tell the 'wrong type' of joke.
Pansies rule!
Those who railed against allowing women to enter these institutions have been proven right.
Yes, Amaroosa, "IS THAT YOU?"
LMAO, good one...
Okay, I glanced at the article, and I didn't see exactly what the remark was. Was it something Freudian about the guns?
PC has more fire power in killing our military's fighting spirit than the MSM does!
I would refuse to serve under Vice Adm. Rodney P. Rempt under any circumstances
Its getting so bad that the military will have to recruit 25% more women so they can pull up the slack women give us one time out of the month. China is not PC and in the future are going to give us hell if it breaks out. Besides, China will have about 40 million surplus men to throw at us when the time comes and PC be damned.
Women shouldn't be in the military in the first place.
I've seen JAG's at work; Promotion = Prosecution.
It's obvious to millions of us, even those of us who have never been in the military.
Women in the military is all going to end horribly.
I hope our country can survive the crash.
OTOH, aren't officers supposed to be gentlemen? Is it so outrageous to expect them to behave as such?
A delicate flower. That's why she joined the military.
"zero-tolerance campaign" is PC-speak for the chilling for free speech.
Liberalism has become the Orwellian future for which they accused conservatives.
And so the Clinton-era feminization of the panty-waist Pentagon and the military continues unabated.
Now I am confused.
Lt. Bryan D. Black is up on charges for a "crude remark" at the insistance of Annapolis school's superintendent, Vice Adm. Rodney P. Rempt.
However, this same Annapolis school's superintendent, Vice Adm. Rodney P. Rempt has ordered all midshipmen and staff to view for the third year straight a play called "Sex Signals." A play in which "The language is so graphic that Adm. Rempt recommends that children should not attend any performance".
How is the play any different from what was said in the supposed "crude remark"?
"Women shouldn't be in the military in the first place."
I see. So you only support troops with penii?
This play will go over like a lead balloon with the brigade, men and women. I doubt if this female Mid has much support within her gender there. They treat everybody the same, male or female. Of course, I don't know exactly what was said either so I may be wrong.
C'mon guys, ease up a little! Women have a right to be in the military, too.
Of course, safety or security must never be comprised in the process! But I think the military is big and versatile enough to handle estrogen in the ranks.
That said, women must realize they're entering an organiztion that has traditionally always been male-dominated, and will continue to be.
That doesn't excuse a lack of respect for each other, though - the military is trying to mold not only men, but GENTLEMEN. So if it's a joke that you wouldn't tell to your mother, don't tell it to another woman.
To understand how all this came about read Kate O'Beirne's new book,'Women Who Make The World Worse'.
Some of the female soldiers I worked with in Iraq were as verbally bawdy as anyone could be.
Yea, he appears to be a real POS.
Thing is, I really get antsy about people who feel women shouldn't be in the military. It upsets me because it seems to invalidate the choices that a lot of women have made--to help and serve their country. It's a personal thing with me, so it sets my teeth, is all. And to have someone say "Women shouldn't be there", suggests to me that they don't support said (female) troops. Kinda like people who don't support the troops 'cause they "shouldn't be there at all".
...if that makes sense. My grammar got mucked, but I hope you can see what I mean. If I misunderstood, please feel free to explain it to me--I'm a good listener, promise!
It's obvious to me too. Since when do they let wussies join the Navy? May as well do like the Frenchies and just whip out our white flags.
This PCBS is one of the reasons I retired as soon as I could.
My experience in the military - and I think this is true of most others - is that there's a certain amount of bawdy and off-color language which helps to remove barriers and to build comradere.
I also think this is true throughout the ages, not just recently in our own time, but historically right back to the Greeks and Romans.
With the entrance of women into mixed-gender military units, who do you think is more obligated to "adjust" to military convention?
And if you think it's males, what do believe should replace this very traditional method of building comradere? Amy Vanderbilt sessions?
Probably not all that different from school children subjected to D.A.R.E. program going to the nurse's office for their dose of Ritalin.
Such a demonstration by men is absolutely the answer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.