Skip to comments.
Navy prosecutes officer for a 'crude' remark (delicate flower got the vapors over joke)
Washington Times ^
| January 7, 2006
| Rowan Scarborough
Posted on 01/07/2006 11:26:27 AM PST by pabianice
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
Once this woman graduates into the fleet I certainly hope the enemy doesn't one day upset this delicate blossom with unkind words. PC is gutting the Navy I love.
1
posted on
01/07/2006 11:26:27 AM PST
by
pabianice
To: pabianice
PC is gutting the Country I love.
2
posted on
01/07/2006 11:30:17 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
(No expiration date is on the Oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic.)
To: B4Ranch
PC is gutting the Country I love.Sadly true however I purpose to continue "to fight the good fight" until they lay me to rest!
3
posted on
01/07/2006 11:32:30 AM PST
by
apackof2
(You can stand me up at the gates of hell, I'll stand my ground and I won’t back down)
To: pabianice
A sailor who made a crude remark. Now there's a capital offense.
Women who get easily offended shouldn't be in the military. That's obvious, isn't it? I guess only to me.
To: pabianice
I was on a carrier in the Indian Ocean during the tailhook '91
scandal witch-hunt.
They made us have a one day stand-down for sexual harassment training....on a ship of 5500 men, no women.
5
posted on
01/07/2006 11:33:48 AM PST
by
SC Swamp Fox
(Bush lied, people dyed....their fingers.)
To: pabianice
"a "crude" remark"=three criminal charges.
I gotta know what he said. I can't think of anything dirty enough to warrant three criminal charges.
6
posted on
01/07/2006 11:34:32 AM PST
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: pabianice
I wonder if the Navy would change its tune if a few thousand members resigned, "because they were afraid they too might offend a member and therefore also face criminal charges."
7
posted on
01/07/2006 11:35:03 AM PST
by
coloradan
(Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
To: All
PC attitudes and JAGs throughout our military are causing more problems then most can even imagine.
To: B4Ranch
Yeah, that is more like it.
9
posted on
01/07/2006 11:35:36 AM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all our troops at home and abroad!!)
To: SC Swamp Fox
I must have the wrong year, I wasn't onboard in '91. Must google....
10
posted on
01/07/2006 11:36:10 AM PST
by
SC Swamp Fox
(Bush lied, people dyed....their fingers.)
To: pabianice
What's she going to do if the enemy captures her and tells her dirty jokes? Is she going to give away all the secrets.
11
posted on
01/07/2006 11:36:11 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: pabianice
The remarks created "an intimidating, hostile and offensive working environment." Amarosa????
To: pabianice
13
posted on
01/07/2006 11:39:30 AM PST
by
oldbrowser
(No matter how cynical I get, I can't seem to keep up)
To: AppyPappy
"What's she going to do if the enemy captures her and tells her dirty jokes?" Write to Senator McCain.
14
posted on
01/07/2006 11:39:58 AM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum.)
To: pabianice
Remember when women demanded to be allowed to enter these institutions. It was said they wouldn't change a thing.
Hazing had been a tradition for centuries. Some of it was over the top, but much of it actually helped to build a strong toughened graduate.
Then the women entered the scene, and now it's even verboten to tell the 'wrong type' of joke.
Pansies rule!
Those who railed against allowing women to enter these institutions have been proven right.
15
posted on
01/07/2006 11:41:07 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
To: King Moonracer
Yes, Amaroosa, "IS THAT YOU?"
LMAO, good one...
16
posted on
01/07/2006 11:41:53 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
To: pabianice
Okay, I glanced at the article, and I didn't see exactly what the remark was. Was it something Freudian about the guns?
17
posted on
01/07/2006 11:42:08 AM PST
by
RichInOC
("...I don't want relationship, I just want BANG BANG BANG!!!")
To: pabianice
PC has more fire power in killing our military's fighting spirit than the MSM does!
18
posted on
01/07/2006 11:43:16 AM PST
by
llevrok
(Chutzpah, with salsa on the side.)
To: pabianice
The Annapolis superintendent is running scared. He must be seen as running a tight "pro-woman" operation, if he has any ideas of getting his next star, so he's thrown this Lt to the wolves
I would refuse to serve under Vice Adm. Rodney P. Rempt under any circumstances
19
posted on
01/07/2006 11:44:44 AM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(A planned society is most appealing to those with the hubris to think they will be the planners)
To: pabianice
Its getting so bad that the military will have to recruit 25% more women so they can pull up the slack women give us one time out of the month. China is not PC and in the future are going to give us hell if it breaks out. Besides, China will have about 40 million surplus men to throw at us when the time comes and PC be damned.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson