---------------------------
This is a completely hypocritical and dishonest position. Rabbis of the Conservative movement are not halachic authorities. No woman goes to them seeking permission to get an abortion.
The Conservative rabbis are asking that the government not hinder them in exerting a religious authority that they do not in fact have.
Phyllis Snyder is president of the National Council of Jewish Women.
National Council of Extremely Liberal JINO Women is a 501(c)(3) organization, but spend a huge amount of time and energy attempting to influence legislation and election of "pro-choice" candidates.
They need a visit from the IRS.
FRmail me to be added or removed from this Judaic/pro-Israel/Russian Jewry ping list.
Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.
So, let me see. If you are a member of a religion that practices human sacrifice, do you really think that Judge Alito would declare all murder laws unconstitutional in order to show "sensitivity" to your religion?
Phyllis Snyder is an intolerant liberal secularist. I'm sure, however, that she is also, at least nominally, a Jew.
Speaking as a Jewish male, all I care about is Alito being bad for whiny lefties of all religions, races, and creeds.
Unfortunately, it's not just Jews who do this. More and more, people are jumping on the bandwagon of identity politics. It would be a good thing if people would thing, "would this be good for America" first. By extension, it would be good for them.
Mark
"Phyllis Snyder is president of the National Council of Jewish Women."
That organization is an abortion front group.
The women are Jewish by blood only.
Their web site doesn't even discuss Jewish topics. If one were to accidently browse without knowing the mame one would think its a generic left wing site
Here are their main issues(from their site):
Sign Here to Stop Alito!
Oppose Social Service Cuts and Tax Bill
Stop Religious Discrimination in Head Start
Take action on other important issues today.
Not Kashrut, Israel, aid to day schools etc
First of all, a reversal of Roe v. Wade would not make abortion illegal. It would only strip abortion of the fig leaf that Constitutional Amendments written in the 18th and 19th Century address the abortion issue in any way, shape or form and throw the issue back to the States. If the liberals want a U.S. Constitutional right to abortion, they should have an Abortion Amendment ratified.
Secondly, when a Jewish woman has an abortion, she does not abort a Baptist, a Hindu, a Catholic, a Muslim or a Druid. She aborts a Jew.
That may suit that woman's needs as a generic individual but it is certainly not "good for the Jews".
I'll never understand it.
This Jew is with Wasserstein. Not only are his arguments more coherent, but unlike Ms. Snyder, he appears to know that the role of the courts is not to legislate.
So more abortions are "good for Jews"?
How can this guy be pro choice and be an observant jew? Unless he is an "observant jew like "holy" Joe LIEberman.