[billhilly]

That may sound like the boogie man, but where is the crime? Inuendo is not the moral equivilent of crime.

[Logical me]

"That may sound like the boogie man, but where is the crime? Inuendo is not the moral equivilent of crime."

Problem is if enough innuendo is pushed on the public, some will not know what to believe. Hence the loss of another Republican vote. They might not go to the RAT party, but Independent. And this slaughter will not stop for the 2006 election cycle. The RAT attack team has probably dozens of thing ready to spring and that is all this RAT attack team has to do. Nothing for the American people, just crap.

[AmishDude]

Yeah, really. There are lots of clues to suggest this is nothing more than a hit piece: The gratuitous inclusion of Delay without any details on his role, the fact that the evidence was released into the Congressional record in 2001 (after Clinton was gone) but that release "damaged" the case against this guy (it must be the weakest of cases, then), the suggestion in the title that they were talking about Abramoff.

People do forget the gigantic number of conservative groups that were audited under Clinton. Forgive me for being a little skeptical here.