Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HOWARD DEAN IN ABRAMOFF CASH FIB
NewsMax ^ | 1/9/06

Posted on 01/09/2006 7:21:33 AM PST by areafiftyone

Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean denied on Sunday that any Democrats had taken money from lobbyist Jack Abramoff, even though several top Dems - including Sen. Hillary Clinton - have already announced they were giving their tainted Abramoff cash to charity.

That little detail didn't faze Dean, however - who insisted with a straight face to CNN's Wolf Blitzer:

"There are no Democrats who took money from Jack Abramoff, not one, not one single Democrat. Every person named in this scandal is a Republican. Every person under investigation is a Republican. Every person indicted is a Republican.

Dean continued: "This is a Republican finance scandal. There is no evidence that Jack Abramoff ever gave any Democrat any money. And we've looked through all of those FEC reports to make sure that's true."

Last week, Sen. Clinton's office announced that she would be donating $2,000 of her Abramoff jackpot to charity. The Republican National Committee says she took a total of $12,900 in Abramoff-linked cash. Other Democrats who have pledged to return tainted donations include Sens. Tim Johnson and Barbara Mikulski - as well as leading House Democrat Charles Rangel.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; abramoff; chairmandean; dean; howarddean
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: nuffsenuff

Tony Snow just played the clip on his show

He said it


21 posted on 01/09/2006 7:44:05 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff

Did Dean actually say this?

Does anyone have a transcript?



Tony Snow just played the tape on his radio show. He actually said it.


22 posted on 01/09/2006 7:44:41 AM PST by overkill_007_2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: overkill_007_2000

LOL! What a doof...

Which CNN show was it on? I want to find a transcript.


23 posted on 01/09/2006 7:46:17 AM PST by nuffsenuff (Don't get stuck on Stupid - General Russ Honore Sept 21, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

When I saw Harry Reid insisting that "this is a Republican scandal" I suspected that that would be the mantra.


24 posted on 01/09/2006 7:47:03 AM PST by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
That List
25 posted on 01/09/2006 7:49:52 AM PST by deport (Happy and Prosperous 2006 to all.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Howard Dean, single handedly making sure that Democrats never regain power.


26 posted on 01/09/2006 7:51:30 AM PST by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
When I saw Harry Reid insisting that "this is a Republican scandal" I suspected that that would be the mantra.

I don't care whose scandal it is. Throw the bums out.

27 posted on 01/09/2006 7:51:47 AM PST by Terabitten (If you've abused the public trust, the public should never trust you again. Throw the bums out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff

Gonna check and see if Wolf Wolf has one up yet.


28 posted on 01/09/2006 7:52:03 AM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

OK - point of order - the word "fib" in this title is somewhat misleading. "Fib" is defined as a small lie, usually an unimportant one.


29 posted on 01/09/2006 7:54:29 AM PST by Hegemony Cricket (Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof - usually by midmorning, or so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

No Transcript up yet. They are not updated yet. Still only has the transcripts from Friday up.


30 posted on 01/09/2006 7:54:36 AM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: quefstar

WHat is "Abramoff-linked" cash?. Why doesn't the story say "cash from Abramoff"?



Because it wasn't all from Abramoff... Most of it came from groups that he lobbied for because he like you and I are limited to the amount he can peersonally give via Campaign regulations. The Bush Presidential Campaign got around $100,000 which was raised by Abramoff but only some $6,000 was direct from Abramoff. They now have donated the $6,000 to charity.


31 posted on 01/09/2006 7:55:40 AM PST by deport (Happy and Prosperous 2006 to all.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Here it is... I found it...

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0601/08/le.01.html

It's towards the bottom.


32 posted on 01/09/2006 7:56:07 AM PST by nuffsenuff (Don't get stuck on Stupid - General Russ Honore Sept 21, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
I'm sorry, you can't expect FACTS to get in the way of Howard Dean making a point--which is, by the way, all Republicans are evil and all Democrats are good.
33 posted on 01/09/2006 7:57:44 AM PST by adgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

There are no Democrats who took money from Jack Abramoff, not one, not one single Democrat. Every person named in this scandal is a Republican. Every person under investigation is a Republican. Every person indicted is a Republican.

-Baghdad Howie-


34 posted on 01/09/2006 7:58:36 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff

Oh thank you. I missed that one.


35 posted on 01/09/2006 7:59:09 AM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MarkeyD

MarkeyD,

Could you also provide us with a list of who and $ that received Linda Dasshole's money???


36 posted on 01/09/2006 8:00:07 AM PST by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: saganite
-- crickets --
37 posted on 01/09/2006 8:01:36 AM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

The 'Rat strategy has reached the point of the surreal. Their philosophy of twisting the facts to the vast underinformed public (thanks to the MSM)- has given way to baldfaced lying in front of clearly obvious facts.

He may be insane - but he's not that uninformed. It is an obviously supercynical strategy whereby he looks at the GOP straight in the eye and say "Yeah, I'm lying. You know it and I know it. Anybody with half a brain knows it. But we don't need any of that type anyway. Whatever you say isn't going to be listened to by our target voters- so knock yourself out trying."

'Rats will be rats. But the MSM has a decision to make. They can show that they are disgustingly partisan liars to even the most dimwitted of sentient beings - and lose any remaining credibility they have with their fast dwindling audiences - or they can make a stand and start surreptitiously inching their way back to a halfway sane position. It'll be interesting to watch.


38 posted on 01/09/2006 8:02:23 AM PST by guitfiddlist (When the 'Rats break out switchblades, it's no time to invoke Robert's Rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quefstar
What is Abramoff-related money?

Abramoff-related money is simply money which can be traced back to Abramoff. With a scandal this big, you don't think that Abramoff is the only guilty lobbyist, do you? He probably had some side companies or other lobbyists working for him. Also, you can say the same for the Republican donations. Some may be directly from Abramoff and some may be from accomplices of Abramoff, hence Abramoff-related.

Abramoff-related or Abramoff-linked is just an easy way of having a general adjective for the entire scandal.

Saying that they didn't receive it DIRECTLY from Abramoff is this scandal's technicality the Dems are trying to use to escape justice.

BTW, you don't see anybody on this site making excuses for the GOP members that may have been involved in this scandal. We just want the MSM to realize that this is not just a GOP thing.
39 posted on 01/09/2006 8:02:40 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Everyone has an equal opportunity, but is not guaranteed an equal outcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
"There are no Democrats who took money from Jack Abramoff, not one, not one single Democrat. Every person named in this scandal is a Republican. Every person under investigation is a Republican. Every person indicted is a Republican.

Most of the dem pundits and commentators have been saying the same thing, with little contradiction from the pubbie pundits and commentators. Whether it is a lie or the truth, the GOP needs to get out in front of this. Otherwise, the 'it was them (pubbies), not us (dems)' will stick in peoples' minds.

But, the pubbies are too busy eating their own again. The vultures have gathered and gone after their own Tom Delay.
40 posted on 01/09/2006 8:03:30 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson