Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Samuel Alito’s Views Could Imperil Most Federal Gun, Ammo, and Explosives Laws (VPC)
VPC ^

Posted on 01/10/2006 3:08:26 PM PST by Dan from Michigan

Supreme Court Nominee Samuel Alito’s Views Could Imperil Most Federal Gun, Ammo, and Explosives Laws, New Violence Policy Center Backgrounder Shows Washington, DC--The Violence Policy Center (VPC) today released a backgrounder on Supreme Court nominee Judge Samuel Alito.

Key aspects of the document include:

Supreme Court nominee Judge Samuel Alito voted to strike down the 1986 federal machine gun ban in the case U.S. v. Rybar, [103 F.3d 273 (3d Cir. 1996)]. Judge Alito was the lone dissenter in the decision upholding the conviction of a gun dealer who sold illegal machine guns at a Pennsylvania gun show.

Application of Judge Alito’s unusual and extremely restrictive view of Congressional regulatory power could imperil virtually every federal law that currently regulates firearms, ammunition, and explosives.

Judge Alito’s opposition to the machine gun ban mirrors that of the National Rifle Association. In 1986, following passage of the ban, then-NRA Institute for Legislative Action Executive Director, now NRA Executive Vice President, Wayne LaPierre stated, “Repealing the machine gun amendment...will be a high priority,” and promised the NRA’s members that the organization would “actively work toward the repeal of the recent machine gun ban and will take all necessary steps to educate the public on the sporting uses and legal ownership of automatic firearms.” The NRA’s efforts at the time failed.

A brief history of machine gun regulation: from the restrictions imposed by the National Firearms Act of 1934 in response to the violence stemming from Prohibition to the banning of the possession and transfer of new machine guns by civilians in 1986 under the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act. The backgrounder concludes, “If Judge Samuel Alito’s views on firearms and public safety, as expressed through his minority opinion in U.S. v. Rybar, became the law of the land, all Americans would be at greater risk from virtually uncontrollable firearms proliferation. The federal government would be almost powerless to keep firearms, ammunition, and other deadly commodities out of the hands of criminals and even terrorists. In a time of increased concern regarding homeland security, such views are not only counterintuitive, but exceedingly dangerous.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alito; banglist; bradywatch; scotus; theskyisfallin; vpc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2006 3:08:29 PM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Good!!


2 posted on 01/10/2006 3:09:42 PM PST by always vigilant (Ignore their heathen prayers and help us blow those bastards straight to hell. - Mel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Judge Alito was the lone dissenter in the decision upholding the conviction of a gun dealer who sold illegal machine guns at a Pennsylvania gun show.

This bodes well for Alito. I like him.

3 posted on 01/10/2006 3:10:44 PM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Rockin' !!

The liberals are scared s**tless. Gotta love the smell of victory in the morning.


4 posted on 01/10/2006 3:11:04 PM PST by farlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Application of Judge Alito’s unusual and extremely restrictive view of Congressional regulatory power could imperil virtually every federal law that currently regulates firearms, ammunition, and explosives.

Wow! He's getting better all the time.

5 posted on 01/10/2006 3:11:16 PM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

The Left would be all for machine guns if they were used in abortions.


6 posted on 01/10/2006 3:11:19 PM PST by atomicpossum (If I don't reply, don't think you're winning. I often just don't bother to argue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

Go Sam Go! Run Sam run! Rule Sam Rule!


7 posted on 01/10/2006 3:12:34 PM PST by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Chuck Schumer is the most disgraceful self absobed individual in the Senate. Hearings on C-SPAN now.


8 posted on 01/10/2006 3:12:57 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

Can't wait. Now if there would be a way to overturn some of the CA's draconian laws, by finding them federally unconstitutional... Well, I'm sure NRA's looking into it.


9 posted on 01/10/2006 3:13:00 PM PST by farlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
In a time of increased concern regarding homeland security, such views are not only counterintuitive, but exceedingly dangerous.

Oh, so now they want to get involved in the WOT. It's all politics for these folks, all promoting their communist agendas.

10 posted on 01/10/2006 3:13:00 PM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

You mean this SOB is going to uphold the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution? I suspected as much!


11 posted on 01/10/2006 3:13:08 PM PST by jjmcgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

I feel freer already.


12 posted on 01/10/2006 3:13:15 PM PST by keithtoo (Global Warming causes everything, and everything causes Global Warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Application of Judge Alito’s unusual and extremely restrictive view of Congressional regulatory power could imperil virtually every federal law that currently regulates firearms, ammunition, and explosives.

I'm all for fewer, better enforced laws. I'm also happy to see Congress stymied. I'm glad to see these feathers getting ruffled.

13 posted on 01/10/2006 3:13:55 PM PST by Steel Wolf (If the Founders had wanted the President to be spying on our phone calls, they would have said so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Damn. If VPC hates him this much, he must be good!


14 posted on 01/10/2006 3:14:05 PM PST by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: always vigilant

I'm getting so frustrated! It's ALI.O.TO! That's his name! Can't we at least get his name right?

/sarc


15 posted on 01/10/2006 3:14:38 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Fight corruption by choking government power and curbing government spending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Another tax-exempt organization. I'd love to know where they get their money. You sure can't find out from their website.


16 posted on 01/10/2006 3:14:48 PM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

You are making my day, Dan in Michigan. What next? Does Alito want to strike down smkoing bans and tobacco and alcohol ad restrictions? Maybe he things the progressive tax is unconstitutional, too.


17 posted on 01/10/2006 3:15:23 PM PST by kerryusama04 (The Bill of Rights is not occupation specific.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Dan, let me fix this for them...

The federal government would be almost is powerless to keep firearms, ammunition, and other deadly commodities out of the hands of criminals and even terrorists.

Instead these fools want us to be disarmed and in the sights of criminals and terrorists!

18 posted on 01/10/2006 3:17:32 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Supreme Court nominee Judge Samuel Alito voted to strike down the 1986 federal machine gun ban in the case U.S. v. Rybar

That is a complete misrepresentation of the case.

19 posted on 01/10/2006 3:17:53 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

macnine guns for all!


20 posted on 01/10/2006 3:18:30 PM PST by Rakkasan1 (Peace de Resistance! Viva la Paper towels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson