Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Samuel Alito ~ Senate Judiciary Hearing [LIVE THREAD] (Day-3)
Senate Judiciary ^ | 1-11-06 | Senate Judiciary

Posted on 01/11/2006 5:01:17 AM PST by OXENinFLA

Day 3: Questioning Continues

This morning, Round 1 concludes with Senators on the Judiciary Cmte. who did not question nominee Alito yesterday. During Round 2, questioning is limited to 20 minutes for each of the eight- een senators. Chairman Arlen Specter (R-PA) leads off, followed by the others, alternating by party in order of seniority.

WEDS., 9:30AM ET, C-SPAN


Live Links

C-span

Judiciary LIVE LINK

FEDNET

CapitolHearings.org


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitoakbar; alitohearings; alitorulz; babykilling; bidenisamoron; bush2rats0; clangingcymbals; demsareduds; emptybarrels; feingoldstinks; feinsteinreeks; judicialnominees; judiciary; kennedysucks; penumbra; scotus; senate; super; superduper; superduperduper; welldecided
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 3,801-3,808 next last
To: Cboldt

Thanks! I need references. Not that I like Wikipedia.....but.....it will be useful for libs.


141 posted on 01/11/2006 6:38:57 AM PST by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

You just gave me my first LOL of the day. Thanks!


142 posted on 01/11/2006 6:39:17 AM PST by daybreakcoming (May God bless those who enter the valley of the shadow of death so that we may see the light of day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Hat-Trick
Leahy sounds and looks constipated this morning.

He's choking on his own words. If one of the Democratic Senators cares to administer the Heimlich maneuver, that might help him.

143 posted on 01/11/2006 6:39:43 AM PST by syriacus (Chuck Schumer is outclassed intellectually by Bush's judicial nominees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Hat-Trick

His coffee hasn't kicked in yet.


144 posted on 01/11/2006 6:40:20 AM PST by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

She doesn't shave her armpits.
I just thought you ought to be informed.


145 posted on 01/11/2006 6:40:21 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten
"Durbin is killing me. He was all pro-life hosting pro-life events in IL UNTIL the dems decided they were pro-abortion and then he switched positions!!"

When did he switch positions?

146 posted on 01/11/2006 6:40:23 AM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
She doesn't shave her armpits.

She is French? ;-)

147 posted on 01/11/2006 6:41:31 AM PST by tiredoflaundry (I'll admit it , I'm a Snow Flake !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

Durbin is troubled, again.


148 posted on 01/11/2006 6:41:44 AM PST by syriacus (Chuck Schumer is outclassed intellectually by Bush's judicial nominees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: jackv
I wish Alito would simply say ABORTION IS NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION. All arguments regarding it must be heard and therefore decided upon!!!

he and Cornyn went over this last night.


CORNYN: And I just want to explore, to start with, Senator Schumer's questions about what is written in this Constitution about abortion. Does the word abortion appear anywhere in the Constitution?

ALITO: No. The word that appears in the Constitution is liberty.

149 posted on 01/11/2006 6:42:01 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
I would have adapted.
150 posted on 01/11/2006 6:42:03 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

Little Dick is troubled again.


151 posted on 01/11/2006 6:42:10 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (If you don't like Jesus, you can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Thanks, I will be cautiously optimistic. We know who is prone to dirty work though.


152 posted on 01/11/2006 6:42:13 AM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake and Bushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten

DICK 'The Turbin' Durbin: "What troubles me and my open mind, is that you won't agree with me -- that abortion is a natural extension of the 14th amendment"


153 posted on 01/11/2006 6:42:15 AM PST by FreedomNeocon (I'm in no Al-Samood for this Shi'ite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

Cocktail Time

154 posted on 01/11/2006 6:42:21 AM PST by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

I don't have an exact time frame for you, but it was sometime in the late 80's I believe. There was a story about it on WLS radio and I think in either the Sun-Times and the Tribune.


155 posted on 01/11/2006 6:42:31 AM PST by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

They know he can't answer that. They're just harassing him now.


156 posted on 01/11/2006 6:42:31 AM PST by ilovew ("We are living through a watershed moment in the story of freedom." GWB 12-14-05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
Alito, from my memory of recent nominees, has given the best and most fair answers on Roe. It is really pathetic and telling to hear Democrat after Democrat push him to commit to an opinion regardless of what facts may come.
157 posted on 01/11/2006 6:42:45 AM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Can anyone explain what is the impact/meaning of "findings"..

Findings of FACT. Legislative findings of the facts on which Congress based the passage of a law. Such as " machine guns are not arms covered by the 2nd Amendment because they were not the type of weapon commonly used in by the troops in warfare when the Constitution was enacted." (I just made that up, of course.)

When judges decide cases as opposed to juries, judges make their own "findings of facts" so that an appeals court can review their actions.
158 posted on 01/11/2006 6:42:51 AM PST by Iwo Jima ("An election is an advanced auction of stolen goods.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

The democrats should just be called the Abortocrats because they have not been talking about anything of substance since this entire thing started.


159 posted on 01/11/2006 6:43:41 AM PST by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Would you want to be on record with an "always statement" if you were about to become a SC justice? The law is about exceptions.

The analysis and discussion at Confrimthem is pretty good. The question can be construed as "Between a Supreme Court precedent and the Constitution, which has superior force?"

The answer depends on how one sees the Supreme Court precedent as being in conformity with the Constitution, and the extent of force the precedent retains - but if there is a difference between precedent and the Constitution, and the precedent is toady an active force in law, most people will say the Constitution prevails.

160 posted on 01/11/2006 6:43:46 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 3,801-3,808 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson