Posted on 01/11/2006 11:22:48 AM PST by calcowgirl
Six years after former Gov. Gray Davis and state legislators created chronic budget deficits by squandering a one-time revenue windfall, and nearly three years after voters dumped Davis and elected Arnold Schwarzenegger to fix the state's tortured finances, the budget is still out of whack. And as spending climbs, it may ooze red ink indefinitely.
As Schwarzenegger on Tuesday proposed a $125.6 billion budget for the fiscal year that begins July 1, he described it as continuing the state "on a path toward fiscal responsibility and economic recovery." But he was wrong on both counts.
The budget, if adopted as proposed, would widen the deficit for still another year, and the state's economy is already humming along quite powerfully - and that's why continuing deficits are so troublesome. If politicians can't balance the budget during a year of record employment and personal income, how could they hope to do so when the inevitable economic downturn occurs?
Inferentially, balancing the budget has become a much lower priority for Schwarzenegger as he expands spending to make peace with a Democrat-controlled Legislature that always wants more, and as he proposes billions of dollars in new public works projects to regain traction with voters, even as he pays lip service to fiscal responsibility. "We must not forget we still have a structural deficit," Schwarzenegger said as he introduced the budget to reporters, adding, "We still have the spending ... no matter how much money we make. ..."
The Republican governor even acknowledged that he could have balanced the budget this year had he not decided to boost school spending sharply in a tacit acknowledgment that the powerful, union-led "Education Coalition" won ...
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
According to the budget doc he submitted yesterday, total General Obligation bonds as of 12/31/2005 are:
--Outstanding: $48B
--Authorized: $100B
I know we paid down some, that's still a fair pile of debt.
excellent sourcing, Marine.
well considering the coffers went from a 12 billion dollar surplus to a 38 billion dollar deficit; I'd say a 50 billion dollar Davis debt would equal the incompetency of the RINOld administration who has had a HUGE influx of revenue in the last year or so...
well, I won't say "I told ya so"....
"According to the budget doc he submitted yesterday, total General Obligation bonds as of 12/31/2005 are:
--Outstanding: $48B
--Authorized: $100B"
DAMN!
well, maybe Maria can convince him to take the Southbound 5 back to L.A. instead of running for reeleciton...
'cause he's definitley not what people were voting for in 2003
Yes! some us did present this scenerio but it fell on deaf ears. So I will say , I told you so. How's that?
"So I will say , I told you so"
now, now...let's not rub it in! LOL
This is what I find which are comparable (by description) to the above $100B/$48B numbers as of 12/31/2005.
These are "State of California" - "Outstanding and Authorized General Obligation Bonds", as were the stated numbers in the Governor's Budget release. However, I'm not sure how the numbers grew so much in 6 months (I think there is a discrepancy here).
As of 07/01/2003 07/01/2004 07/01/2005 Authorized $63B $75B $79B Outstanding $26B $33B $35B
Check out these numbers for an eyeopener.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1555544/posts?page=34#34
"I'm not sure how the numbers grew so much in 6 months"
interest?
those vig payments will kill ya! LOL
especially when you have junk bond status...
How Much Do We Already Owe?
Figure 7 shows that as of November 1, 2005, the state had almost $53 billion of General Fund debt outstanding. This includes about $42 billion in bond debt that it has used to fund infrastructure (close to $35 billion in general obligation bonds and nearly $8 billion of lease-revenue bonds). The figure also shows the debt outstanding from the deficit-financing bonds issued in 2004 (currently $10.4 billion).
Figure 7
Figure 7 Summary of State of California Outstanding and |
||
As of November 1, 2005 |
||
|
Outstanding Debt |
Unissued |
General Obligation Bonds |
|
|
Corrections |
$1.1 |
b |
Health |
|
$0.8 |
Higher Education |
4.7 |
3.7 |
Housing |
|
2.1 |
K-12 Education |
22.0 |
12.3 |
Resources |
1.7 |
0.8 |
State Administration |
0.3 |
0.2 |
Stem Cells |
|
3.0 |
Transportation |
1.8 |
0.2 |
Water |
2.8 |
6.5 |
Local Governmentc |
0.1 |
0.3 |
Other |
d |
|
Total, General Obligation Bonds |
$34.5 |
$29.9 |
Lease-Revenue Bonds |
$7.8 |
$3.2 |
Deficit-Financing Bondse |
10.4 |
4.1 |
Totals |
$52.6 |
$37.2 |
|
||
Source: California State Treasurer |
||
a Includes $19.4 billion in authorized commercial paper, of which $1.2 billion has been issued. These funds are used to initiate projects until bonds are sold. |
||
b Includes $10 million in unissued bonds. |
||
c Includes bonds for reading and literacy improvement and library construction. |
||
d Includes $4 million in bonds for hazardous substance clean up and senior citizens centers. |
||
e These are self-liquidating general obligation bonds secured by a one-quarter cent share of the local sales and use tax. However, in exchange, the General Fund pays an equivalent amount in increased Proposition 98 funding to schools. |
The numbers I posted definitely did not include lease revenue bonds. But the first numbers ($100/$48) excluded the "deficit financing" bonds (or Economic Recovery bonds, i.e. Prop 57/58 bonds). So, the numbers make sense if you add $10 Billion to the numbers for 2004 and 2005. That closely reconciles to your numbers.
But the first numbers ($100/$48)excludedincluded the "deficit financing" bonds (or Economic Recovery bonds, i.e. Prop 57/58 bonds) and the 2003-2005 numbers excluded them. So, the numbers make sense if you add $10 Billion to the numbers for 2004 and 2005. That closely reconciles to your numbers.
He has no where to go. We elected him to change things. He came to us with the tools he needed to fix this mess, and the people voted them down. He cannot do anything. The Unions own this state and will drive it into bankrupcy come hell or high water.
They are mostly democrats, socialists, and communists. This once golden state is doomed to it's watery grave.
Either way, it's not to be sneezed at or allowed to get out of control.
May? LOL May?
Sheesh...
The Governor proposes the budget, has line-item veto power, and final approval authority. This latest budget proposal represents an increase in general fund spending of 37% since taking office. This budget is Arnold's budget, not the legislatures, the democrats, or anyone elses. When the legislature gets done with it, it will grow a bit, and Arnold currently has the tools (line item veto) to correct that. (But he hasn't used it before, so I don't expect him to in the future).
The "tools" he proposed to "fix" the mess (Prop 76 mid-year corrections) would not change any of this. Additionally, Prop 76 would have only allowed him to borrow more money and defer more expense. He has not used any of the tools he has to reduce spending, only to increase it. To say that he can do nothing is naive, at best.
LOL. One last glimmer of hope. ;-)
If McClatchy is complaining, the situation is so far out of hand that even a third grader knows something is wrong in Schwarzeneggerland.
Agreed. But somebody forgot to tell our Assemblymembers.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1556113/posts?page=11#11
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.