Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenpeace rejects latest ramming claims (Good video clips of GP hitting Japanese ship)
The Daily Telegraph ^ | Jan 12, 2006

Posted on 01/11/2006 6:44:28 PM PST by proud_yank

GREENPEACE has rejected fresh claims from Japan that activists harassing a whaling fleet in the Southern Ocean were responsible for a collision between two ships.

Video released by The Japanese Institute of Cetacean Research

Video released by Greenpeace Oddly enough, this link wouldn't open

The Greenpeace vessel Arctic Sunrise was involved in the collision with the Japanese whale processing ship Nisshin Maru on Sunday, putting a 1.5-metre dent in the Sunrise's bow and bending its forward mast.

Japan has released a video in a bid to prove Greenpeace targeted its ship.

The Tokyo-based Institute of Cetacean Research said the video showed the 1,000 tonne Arctic Sunrise moving steadily forward before hitting the 8,000 tonne Nisshin Maru, whose movement was impeded by another whaling vessel nearby.

But Greenpeace maintains the larger ship was at fault.

"They've certainly got balls of steel, those guys," Greenpeace expedition leader Shane Rattenbury said from the group's second vessel, Esperanza.

"Having been on the bridge of the Arctic Sunrise at the time of the incident, I know there was no way we were responsible.

"Even the photo Japan put out the other day, if you look closely there's a wake in front of our ship because we were actually in reverse at the time."

Greenpeace's Australian chief executive Steve Shallhorn said an investigation would prove Japan was at fault.

"According to international maritime law, the starboard vessel, the Arctic Sunrise had the right of way," he said.

"We fully expect official investigation to concur with the Greenpeace version of the event."

The crew of the Arctic Sunrise plan to repair the vessel when it eventually docks in Fremantle or South Africa, and Greenpeace is considering a damages claim against Japan.

Also this week, Greenpeace ships – currently operating about 4,000km south west of Perth – received a rare radio transmission from the Japanese whaling fleet.

But the message, translated by Greenpeace interpreters, was hardly an olive branch.

"All the responsibility for any accidents that originate in dangerous obstructive actions lie with you," said Shigetoshi Nishiwaki, the head of Japan's scientific whaling program who is on board the Nisshin Maru.

"We strongly demand that Greenpeace cease your obstruction of our legitimate survey and leave the survey area immediately."

Arctic Sunrise captain Arne Sorensen accused the Nisshin Maru of deliberately damaging his ship and delivered a blunt reply.

"You are a disgrace to the Kyodo Senpaku fleet. You have discredited the Institute of Cetacean Research. You have dishonoured yourselves," he said.

Mr Rattenbury said it was the first time the whaling fleet had radioed Greenpeace during the current confrontation, and only the second time ever.

Japan plans to catch 935 minke whales and 10 fin whales this southern summer for what it insists is scientific research.

Conservationists maintain it is a commercial operation.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Japan
KEYWORDS: arctic; envirowackos; greenpeace; ratviolence; whaling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
More video footage, from another angle Some footage of their inflatables as well in this clip.

More links and info Here

Greenpeace's side of the incident, with video clip Oddly enough, their video footage doesn't reveal a whole lot. Hmm...Imagine that. Also, if you look closely, you see no wake off the Japanese research ship.
1 posted on 01/11/2006 6:44:33 PM PST by proud_yank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: proud_yank




8 January 2006.- Greenpeace or Sea Shepherd activists throwing ropes and hooks near the Nisshin-Maru’s propeller to sabotage it. One rope and a buoy are already in the water.
2 posted on 01/11/2006 6:46:49 PM PST by proud_yank (Aspiring CEO of a multinational corporation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

Reminds me of a Seinfeld episode for some reason.


3 posted on 01/11/2006 6:48:45 PM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank
8 January 2006.- Greenpeace or Sea Shepherd activists throwing ropes and hooks near the Nisshin-Maru’s propeller to sabotage it.

Uhmmm....I don't know much about maritime law, but can't you do something to stop another vessel from sabotaging your ship? Like, ohhhhhhhhh...shoot at the marauding ship?

4 posted on 01/11/2006 6:51:29 PM PST by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

Enviro terror by any other name...


5 posted on 01/11/2006 6:53:20 PM PST by xcamel (Exposing clandestine operations is treason. 13 knots make a noose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

I'm no expert on maritime right of way issues, but I think generally a ship that seeks out another ship with the intent to immobilize or damage it would generally be considered the responsible party in an ensuing collision.


6 posted on 01/11/2006 6:54:58 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

We thought they were pirates so we sank them. Oh, it was Greenpeace? No can read Engrish. Solly! More like Greenwar, no?


7 posted on 01/11/2006 6:55:23 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
Enviro terror by any other name...

Naww...They're just reeeaaaallly committed to their worthy cause!
8 posted on 01/11/2006 6:55:43 PM PST by proud_yank (Aspiring CEO of a multinational corporation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

It would be funny if the hooks got wrapped around the props and it yanked the inflatable underwater.


9 posted on 01/11/2006 6:56:24 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: randog
Uhmmm....I don't know much about maritime law, but can't you do something to stop another vessel from sabotaging your ship? Like, ohhhhhhhhh...shoot at the marauding ship?

Shoulder fire missiles anyone? Hell, that close you outta be able to lob a flaming 55-gal drum of fuel onto the decks of the GP Fagship.
10 posted on 01/11/2006 6:57:50 PM PST by proud_yank (Aspiring CEO of a multinational corporation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

They need to sink their ships and leave the envirowhackos for the sharks.


11 posted on 01/11/2006 6:59:11 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault
We thought they were pirates so we sank them. Oh, it was Greenpeace? No can read Engrish. Solly! More like Greenwar, no?

It would be funny if the hooks got wrapped around the props and it yanked the inflatable underwater.


ROFLMAO and PIMP!!! You're on a roll tonight RWA!
12 posted on 01/11/2006 6:59:53 PM PST by proud_yank (Aspiring CEO of a multinational corporation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: randog
Uhmmm....I don't know much about maritime law, but can't you do something to stop another vessel from sabotaging your ship? Like, ohhhhhhhhh...shoot at the marauding ship?

I would think trying to disable a ship would be considered piracy. Wouldn't the Japanese be within their rights to break out the harpoon gun, assuming they didn't have anything better on board.

13 posted on 01/11/2006 7:00:22 PM PST by magslinger (At the end of the day the only truly educated people are autodidacts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: girlangler

PING!


14 posted on 01/11/2006 7:01:08 PM PST by proud_yank (Aspiring CEO of a multinational corporation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

Piracy!


15 posted on 01/11/2006 7:03:23 PM PST by SmithL (Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Lift up your gates and sing, Hosana in the highest! Hosana to your King!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

I don't know much about ships but that Greenpeace boat looks just like the one from King Kong.


16 posted on 01/11/2006 7:06:09 PM PST by keat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault; dead; randog; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
I'm no expert on maritime right of way issues, but I think generally a ship that seeks out another ship with the intent to immobilize or damage it would generally be considered the responsible party in an ensuing collision.

68-69TGYC, can you offer any insight as to the rules of defending your ship in an instance like this? What are the international waterway laws with something like this?
17 posted on 01/11/2006 7:06:53 PM PST by proud_yank (Aspiring CEO of a multinational corporation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

Gee, wonder what would happen if they dropped the anchor on the reasearch boat into that inflatable boat??????


18 posted on 01/11/2006 7:10:11 PM PST by Arrowhead1952 (I never got a job from a person on a government program.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

One Mk-48 ADCAP; no more problem.


19 posted on 01/11/2006 7:12:35 PM PST by WardMClark (Semi-Notorious Political Gadfly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank
Image hosted by Photobucket.com sena ALL their sorry arses to DavyJonesLocker!!
20 posted on 01/11/2006 7:16:49 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson