I asked you--courteously--to provide evidence that your plan of action will work. Your response is to accuse me of being a party shill. You accuse me and many other good Americans of treasonous conduct, and the only reason you can think of that I would call that shameful is that I'm a party shill. Still examining that bark rather closely, eh? You've got nothing and so you slander a fellow vet.
You are the one who can't admit that if was not for men like John O'Neill and Zell Miller that you would be saying president hanoi kerry
1. That's either a lie or such a grievous error that it zotted the last tatters of your credibility. I have given the Swiftees credit on this board numerous times, and you know it! Either that or you're so busy looking down your nose at everybody who doesn't want get saved by the Gospel According to Tonk that you've mistaken me for somebody else.
2. Even if that were true and I didn't give the Siftees their due, what would that have to do with whether your silly plan to "get" Kerry will actually work? At first I thought you were just short on logic skills (like when you turn "Kerry got 48% of the vote" into "The Swiftees didn't help") but now I see that you can't back any of it up, you can't even get the Constitutional law on it straight, so you slander fellow vets! John Kerry would be laughing his poodle butt off at you if he read this thread.
I said you were a better man than this.
I was wrong.
Is there a valid reason why you ignore other posters
to you and instead "lock on" to me.
Have you evem bothered to read the post by river rat
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1557630/posts?page=320#320