Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomCalls
However, manufacturing it, importing it, possessing it, appearing in public while under its influence, or engaging in commerce in it remain constitutionally prohibited.

I would agree that the feds have the authority to prohibit the importation of cocaine, as that is an issue regarding our borders.

Now, here is a thornier issue - where does the federal government get the Constitutional authority to prohibit someone from growing a pot plant in their home for their own consuption. Hint: No commerce is involved and the pot does not cross state borders. And if you resort to Wickard to justify the feds prohibiting such, may you be sewn into a sack with Helen Thomas and thrown on a waterbed.

144 posted on 01/15/2006 3:35:37 PM PST by dirtboy (My new years resolution is to quit using taglines...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
Now, here is a thornier issue - where does the federal government get the Constitutional authority to prohibit someone from growing a pot plant in their home for their own consuption.

They don't. Only the states have that authority. That's why the 18th Amendment was needed to permit the feds to prohibit personal consumption of alcohol. Now getting the courts to agree with that interpretation is a different story.

163 posted on 01/15/2006 3:56:40 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson